2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.65.054908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why is theJ/ψsuppression enhanced at large transverse energy?

Abstract: We study the ratio of J/ψ over minimum bias in P b P b collisions at SPS energy. The NA50 data exhibit a sharp turn-over at E T ∼ 100 GeV (close to the knee of the E T distribution) followed by a steady, steep decrease at larger E T . We show that this behaviour can be explained by the combined effects of a small decrease of the hadronic E T in the J/ψ event sample (due to the E T taken by the J/ψ trigger), together with the sharp decrease of the E T distributions in this E T region (tail). This phenomenon doe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
47
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter sets in once a QGP starts forming, which, coupled with the rather strong QGP suppression, mimics the first drop at around E T ≃40 GeV. The overall good description of the NA50 data extends beyond E T > 100 GeV (not shown here) when incorporating transverse energy fluctuations [ 13] and a careful assessment of the minimum bias analysis [ 14], cf. ref.…”
Section: Spsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter sets in once a QGP starts forming, which, coupled with the rather strong QGP suppression, mimics the first drop at around E T ≃40 GeV. The overall good description of the NA50 data extends beyond E T > 100 GeV (not shown here) when incorporating transverse energy fluctuations [ 13] and a careful assessment of the minimum bias analysis [ 14], cf. ref.…”
Section: Spsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 displays the ratio of J/ψ→µµ to Drell-Yan dimuons as a function of centrality. The agreement between model (solid line) and data is fair for semi-/central collisions (at E T >100 GeV, the data can be reproduced by accounting for transverse energy fluctuations and losses in the minimum bias analysis at impact parameters close to zero [32], cf. Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…absorption by comovers starts at t = t 0 and ends at t 1 , when the comover density n c ( b, s) · t 0 /t 1 has reached a value n f independent of b and s. The comover approach contains a definite time structure for anomalous suppression and we have not changed it. We also account for the transverse energy fluctuations [10], by replacing n c by Et <Et> n c , and the transverse energy loss [11] induced by the J/ψ trigger, by rescaling < E t > by a factor np−2 np , which have been shown to be significant for the explanation of the sharp decrease of S J/ψ (E t ) at E t > 100 GeV. In the choice of parameters we have followed [10,12]: n co ( b, s) = 1.5 n p ( b, s) with the participant density from eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%