2019
DOI: 10.20507/maijournal.2019.8.2.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why isn’t my professor Pasifika? A snapshot of the academic workforce in New Zealand universities

Abstract: This paper examines the ethnicity of academic scholars employed by New Zealand's eight universities, with a particular focus on Pasifika academics. The paper discusses how, despite national and university policies to see education serve Pasifika peoples better, there has been no change in the numbers of Pasifika academics employed by the universities between 2012 and 2017, and notes that Pasifika who are in the academy are continually employed in the lower, less secure levels of the academy. Examining internat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, an initiative could involve no-strings promotion of science and scientific ideas to early school-age students (O'Connor and Stevens 2015). From there it needs continued support at high-school and university levels, as well as visible role models (McAllister et al 2019;Naepi 2019).…”
Section: Discussion and Mahere Kaupapa/project Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, an initiative could involve no-strings promotion of science and scientific ideas to early school-age students (O'Connor and Stevens 2015). From there it needs continued support at high-school and university levels, as well as visible role models (McAllister et al 2019;Naepi 2019).…”
Section: Discussion and Mahere Kaupapa/project Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Fund a scholarship' is a typical response but this requires a meaningful and engaged senior Māori scientist to supervise and/or mentor. As noted by McAllister et al (2019) and Naepi (2019), Māori and Pasifika are poorly represented in the research/academic sector. A consequence is researchers with Māori interests and perspectives are highly over-subscribed in terms of projects they are asked to contribute to, and get co-opted into.…”
Section: āHeitanga/capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, McAllister et al (2019, p. 245) call for the development of "plural-" rather than uni-versities, in which indigenous bodies, ontologies and epistemologies are "understood as equal partners" at all levels. Notably, they acknowledge that re-imagining education in this way would require thinking "outside of our current economic system" (p. 245, also see Naepi, 2019).…”
Section: Place Kaitiakitanga Whanaungatanga and Manaakitangamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In higher education contexts, this may... translate into confusion about who is responsible for welcoming new arrivals and how best to create ongoing markers of belonging for international students in a context where the very notion of belonging is contested between indigenous and settler groups. (p. 1211) At a classroom level, manaakitanga-based teaching would refuse to represent Western knowledge as drawing on a monolithic, unified tradition that is inherently superior to others (Doherty & Singh, 2005;McAllister et al, 2019;Naepi, 2019;Takayama, 2016). This is challenging, given the dominance of the English language in academic publishing and communication internationally.…”
Section: Place Kaitiakitanga Whanaungatanga and Manaakitangamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is equally disturbing in the United States where Native American peoples make up only 0.5% of the academic faculty in higher education despite comprising roughly 2% of the population (Walters et al 2019). Likely the product of adverse academic experiences for indigenous peoples, such underrepresentation is unsurprising given the inequities faced by indigenous faculty who often have a different occupation shape and career trajectory to their peers (Middleton and McKinley, 2010), are more likely to witness or experience discrimination (Henry et al, 2017), are much less likely to be on permanent contracts, and who have much shorter careers than other researchers in the ethnic majority (Kidman and Chu, 2015), who experience hurtful public censures from non-indigenous academics (Calhoun, 2003), and who face identity related tokenism (e.g., increased scrutiny, stereotyping) and exclusion (feeling invisible, lack of belonging) (Henry et al, 2017;McAllister et al, 2019;Naepi, 2019;Settles et al, 2019). Such feelings and experiences can have devastating impacts on indigenous faculty trying to prove their worth in colonial institutions pushing neoliberal agendas of excellence.…”
Section: Liberal Exclusion Of the Indigenousmentioning
confidence: 99%