2019
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why many oncologists fail to share accurate prognoses: They care deeply for their patients

Abstract: Although most patients with cancer wish to know their prognosis, oncologists often fail to initiate timely and repeated discussions of prognosis with their patients. This gap, rooted in physicians' deep care and optimism for their patients, may be narrowed by 3 complementary approaches: asking simple questions to open up the discussion, assessing patient preferences, and using prognostic tools that can help with the accuracy of prognoses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Communication about prognosis and treatment gives rise to physician and patient related barriers alike. One thing is the emotional element on the part of physicians, patient and family that is difficult to handle and relates to fostering hope [ 58 ]. Further many physicians experience a psychological discomfort associated with disclosing a poor prognosis and feel they lack the necessary skills to communicate bad news [ 59 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication about prognosis and treatment gives rise to physician and patient related barriers alike. One thing is the emotional element on the part of physicians, patient and family that is difficult to handle and relates to fostering hope [ 58 ]. Further many physicians experience a psychological discomfort associated with disclosing a poor prognosis and feel they lack the necessary skills to communicate bad news [ 59 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We appreciate the thoughtful and valuable responses to our initial commentary by Abernethy et al in their editorial and by Loh et al in their letter. The former touch on potential methods that oncologists could use to improve their communication skills and the quality of the information delivered, and the latter focus on addressing providers' emotions when they are forced to deliver difficult news.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although we acknowledge the potential clinical value of prognostic tools highlighted by Abernethy et al for assisting oncologists in forming an accurate prognosis (recognizing that the rapid advancement of the field ensures a moving target for many such instruments), these do not address perhaps a more fundamental problem: overcoming the considerable “activation energy” to disclose prognoses to patients in the first place. In many circumstances, the prognosis is clear, yet disclosure does not occur.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We read with interest the articles by Al‐Samkari and Abernethy et al published in Cancer . Both articles emphasize that prognostic awareness is poor among patients with cancer, and we would add that the same applies to caregivers of these patients .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%