2010
DOI: 10.1093/jahist/97.3.703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Mass Incarceration Matters: Rethinking Crisis, Decline, and Transformation in Postwar American History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Use of both terms has increased dramatically, becoming staples of the contemporary punishment and society literature. These terms have spread beyond interdisciplinary journals for punishment studies to law and society (e.g., Comfort, 2008; Gottschalk, 2009; Kaufman et al 2016; Schoenfeld, 2010; Simon, 2013), sociology (e.g., Wacquant, 2009c, 2010; Lacey, 2010; Bernstein, 2012), political science (e.g., Gottschalk, 2008; Grasso, 2017; Walker, 2014; Weaver and Lerman, 2010), geography (e.g., Peck, 2003), anthropology (e.g., Gilmore, 1999), history (e.g., Hernández et al 2015; Lichtenstein 2011; Thompson 2010; Thompson and Murch 2015), gender studies (e.g., McKim, 2014), and philosophy (e.g., Nichols, 2014). 2 Although primarily used to describe the US context, the terms have been used to discuss Canada (Nichols, 2014), England (Garland, 1996), Europe (Wacquant 2009a), Norway (Shammas, 2016), and Latin American countries (Müller, 2012), among others (see also Garland, 2013; Gottschalk, 2009), even as some scholars question its applicability outside the US (Lacey, 2010; Zedner, 2016: 5).…”
Section: The Rise Of the Penal State Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Use of both terms has increased dramatically, becoming staples of the contemporary punishment and society literature. These terms have spread beyond interdisciplinary journals for punishment studies to law and society (e.g., Comfort, 2008; Gottschalk, 2009; Kaufman et al 2016; Schoenfeld, 2010; Simon, 2013), sociology (e.g., Wacquant, 2009c, 2010; Lacey, 2010; Bernstein, 2012), political science (e.g., Gottschalk, 2008; Grasso, 2017; Walker, 2014; Weaver and Lerman, 2010), geography (e.g., Peck, 2003), anthropology (e.g., Gilmore, 1999), history (e.g., Hernández et al 2015; Lichtenstein 2011; Thompson 2010; Thompson and Murch 2015), gender studies (e.g., McKim, 2014), and philosophy (e.g., Nichols, 2014). 2 Although primarily used to describe the US context, the terms have been used to discuss Canada (Nichols, 2014), England (Garland, 1996), Europe (Wacquant 2009a), Norway (Shammas, 2016), and Latin American countries (Müller, 2012), among others (see also Garland, 2013; Gottschalk, 2009), even as some scholars question its applicability outside the US (Lacey, 2010; Zedner, 2016: 5).…”
Section: The Rise Of the Penal State Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they opposed racial integration at the local level, they supported national candidates who were pro-civil rights. This split political personality became less tenable as crime and disorder 'became the fulcrum points at which the local and national intersected', thus weakening the New Deal coalition (Flamm, 2007: 10; Thompson, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the years between 1970 and 2010 more American citizens became inmates of prisons than all the imprisoned citizens of all other countries in the world (Thompson, 2010). Mainly, mass incarceration ideology was formed through criminalizing urban centers which housed many individuals of colour; this was coupled with repressive drug laws and punitive sentencing (Thompson, 2010).…”
Section: Persons Of Colourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mainly, mass incarceration ideology was formed through criminalizing urban centers which housed many individuals of colour; this was coupled with repressive drug laws and punitive sentencing (Thompson, 2010). In the US 53% of those incarcerated are there for drug related offenses (Bewley-Taylor et al, 2009, p. 6).…”
Section: Persons Of Colourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation