2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why measuring blueberry firmness at harvest is not enough to estimate postharvest softening after long term storage? A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Therefore, at the time of peak harvest, control fruits showed the lowest water loss rates; this situation has been reported previously (Moggia et al 2022;Moggia and Lobos 2023).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). Therefore, at the time of peak harvest, control fruits showed the lowest water loss rates; this situation has been reported previously (Moggia et al 2022;Moggia and Lobos 2023).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Among the main pathways of water loss, both the stem scar and the cuticle have been proposed as the most relevant barriers influencing postharvest dehydration in blueberries (Lara et al 2014;Moggia and Lobos 2023;Moggia et al 2016Moggia et al , 2017bMoggia et al , 2018Shepherd and Wynne 2006;Wang et al 2022;Yan and Castellarin 2022). Although the area of the stem scar corresponds to <1% of the fruit surface, it is responsible for 40% to 60% of water loss (Moggia et al 2017b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%