2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.97.034005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Ξ(1690) and Ξ(2120) are so narrow

Abstract: The Ξ baryons are expected to be naturally narrower as compared to their nonstrange and strange counterparts since they have only one light quark and, thus, their decay involves producing either a light meson and doubly strange baryon or both meson and baryon with strangeness which involves, relatively, more energy. In fact, some Ξ's have full widths of the order of even 10-20 MeV when, in principle, they have a large phase space to decay to some open channels. Such is the case of Ξ(1690), for which the width … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the φ production, s-channel Λ, u-channel proton, and t-channel K − exchange diagrams are included in the calculation, as shown in Fig. 1 Here, we assume that the Ξ(1690) − has a spin-parity of J p = 1/2 − , as suggested by theoretical works [5,8] and reported by the BaBar Collaboration [13]. To compute the invariant amplitudes for the K − p → K + K − Λ reaction, we use the effective Lagrangian densities for the interaction vertices as follows:…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the φ production, s-channel Λ, u-channel proton, and t-channel K − exchange diagrams are included in the calculation, as shown in Fig. 1 Here, we assume that the Ξ(1690) − has a spin-parity of J p = 1/2 − , as suggested by theoretical works [5,8] and reported by the BaBar Collaboration [13]. To compute the invariant amplitudes for the K − p → K + K − Λ reaction, we use the effective Lagrangian densities for the interaction vertices as follows:…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-star states include Ξ(1690) − , Ξ(1820)(J p = 3/2 − ), Ξ(1950), and Ξ(2030). The third state of Ξ has not yet been confirmed between Ξ(1620) and Ξ(1690) − , and theoretical model predictions are still controversial [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The existence of Ξ(1620) near ΛK is dubious and requires further experimental confirmation with higher statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S = −2 three-star baryon states include Ξ(1690) − , Ξ(1820)(J p = 3/2 − ), Ξ(1950), and Ξ(2030). The third state of Ξ has not yet been confirmed between Ξ(1620) and Ξ(1690) − [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Ξ(1690) − is near the ΣK threshold, and its existence has been firmly established by several experiments [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we assume that the Ξ(1690) − has a spin-parity of J p = 1/2 − , as suggested by theoretical works [5,8] and reported by the BaBar Collaboration [13]. To compute the invariant amplitudes for the K − p → K + K − Λ reaction, we use the effective Lagrangian densities for the interaction vertices as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation