2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Mohr-circle analyses may underestimate the risk of fault reactivation in depleting reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tested model of the pipe–soil system consists of 237,766 finite elements (75,599 for the pipe; 162,167 for the soil) and 377,615 nodes. The soil was modeled with the use of the elastic–ideally plastic Coulomb–Mohr model, which is one of the most frequently used models in soil numerical descriptions [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. The elastoplastic models describe the state of deformation and soil load in the zones subject to the limit state.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tested model of the pipe–soil system consists of 237,766 finite elements (75,599 for the pipe; 162,167 for the soil) and 377,615 nodes. The soil was modeled with the use of the elastic–ideally plastic Coulomb–Mohr model, which is one of the most frequently used models in soil numerical descriptions [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. The elastoplastic models describe the state of deformation and soil load in the zones subject to the limit state.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, fault systems can control the deformation of rock masses and affect the deformation response of underground excavations in soft rock [16]. Each fracture's structure, the magnitude of tectonic stress, and the proximity to fractures play a crucial role in disturbing the regional stress field and forming small-scale variations [17]. The stress state of the Earth's crust is related to the dynamic nature of faults [18], and different fault factors such as the fault activity distance, slip rate, friction coefficient, fault thickness, and fault dip angle significantly influence the distribution of the stress field [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%