2017
DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2017.1409082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why nuclear weapon ban treaty is unlikely to fulfil its promise

Abstract: Recent discussion about the nuclear ban treaty is the culmination of the "Humanitarian initiative", arguably the most important development within the non-proliferation regime over the past Review cycle. Supporters see such treaty as the first step to forcing countries possessing nuclear weapons to disarm. This paper argues that a ban treaty is a bad idea because it would neither strengthen the norms, nor make the world a safer place. Instead, it would weaken the position of international law, and put premium … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These difficulties have been broadly recognized. Some scholars are positive about the potential future normative developments (Considine, 2019;Egeland, 2018;Ritchie, 2019), others see risks associated with looking at the nuclear weapon ban and disarmament from an arms control perspective (Onderco, 2017;Müller, 2020).…”
Section: Emerging Technologies Could Create New Opportunities For Disarmamentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These difficulties have been broadly recognized. Some scholars are positive about the potential future normative developments (Considine, 2019;Egeland, 2018;Ritchie, 2019), others see risks associated with looking at the nuclear weapon ban and disarmament from an arms control perspective (Onderco, 2017;Müller, 2020).…”
Section: Emerging Technologies Could Create New Opportunities For Disarmamentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is at this level that we see the cognitive dissonance for nuclear client states who on the one hand identify as NPT non-nuclear weapon states committed to nuclear disarmament -the core aim of the TPNW -and on the other as supporters of nuclear deterrence and nuclear weapons. Groups and group identification matter in norm theory because evidence shows that compliance with norms relies on the extent to which others in a state's in-group also comply (Onderco 2017). International/group recognition as both a "responsible" NPT non-nuclear weapon state and a nuclear client state pulls these states in different directions.…”
Section: Universalisation and Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ban critics have also not presented convincing arguments for the allegation that the TPNW is a showstopper for nuclear disarmament negotiations; negotiations had stalled years before the ban was negotiated. 24…”
Section: Harald Müller and Carmen Wunderlichmentioning
confidence: 99%