Why Panel Tests of Purchasing Power Parity Should Allow for Heterogeneous Mean Reversion

Abstract

Recent studies of purchasing power parity (PPP) use panel tests that fail to take into account heterogeneity in the speed of mean reversion across real exchange rates. In contrast to several other severe restrictions of panel models and tests of PPP, the assumption of homogeneous mean reversion is still widely used and its consequences are virtually unexplored. This paper analyzes the properties of homogeneous and heterogeneous panel unit root testing methodologies. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we uncover important adverse properties of the panel approach that relies on homogeneous estimation and testing. More specifically, power functions are low and assume irregular shapes. Furthermore, homogeneous estimates of the mean reversion parameters exhibit potentially large biases. These properties can lead to misleading inferences on the validity of PPP. Our findings highlight the importance of allowing for heterogeneous estimation when testing for a unit root in panels of real exchange rates.

The link between life insurance activities and economic growth: Some new evidence

“…A common problem encountered in empirical research on insurance premiums is finding data covering a short time dimension. 5 Such a procedure has already extensively been used in applied works, e.g., Rapach and Wohar (2004) and Koedijk et al (2004Koedijk et al ( , 2011, to mention a few. Our research is novel in that it is the first study that models RPLIP and RPGDP within a panel SURADF framework.…”

Nonlinear trends in real exchange rates: A panel unit root test approach

“…For example, in choosing the CIPS test we do not constrain the adjustment speeds to the longrun equilibrium to be equal. Thus we implicitly accept the advice of Im et al (1997Im et al ( , 2003, Maddala and Wu (1999), and Koedijk et al (2011). In contrast, Papell and Theodoridis (2001) and Lopez (2008) argue in favor of the constraint.…”