2013
DOI: 10.1080/17520843.2012.735248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why persistent high inflation impedes growth? An empirical assessment of threshold level of inflation for India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical estimations of the tolerable or threshold inflation led to the establishment of inflation in the range of 5-7 percent (but tending to 5-6 percent) as the objective of monetary policy (Rangarajan, 1997). These estimates are corroborated by recent studies (Mohanty et al, 2011;Pattanaik and Nadhanael, 2011) Statistical evidence of reasonable stability in the demand for money yielded the income elasticity of money demand of 1.77 as a key operating parameter, with the coefficient on inflation at unity (Rangarajan, 1994 (Rangarajan and Singh, 1984); so the money supply rule in its reduced from consisted of determining the growth of reserve money adjusted for reserve requirements as the monetary authority could determine or at least influence the monetary base even in the presence of fiscal dominance and administered interest rates (Rangarajan, 1985). Ending automatic monetization of fiscal deficits was addressed in the context of central bank autonomy (Rangarajan, 1993) 12 , and over the period 1994-97 it was phased out.…”
Section: India's Monetary Policy Frameworksupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Empirical estimations of the tolerable or threshold inflation led to the establishment of inflation in the range of 5-7 percent (but tending to 5-6 percent) as the objective of monetary policy (Rangarajan, 1997). These estimates are corroborated by recent studies (Mohanty et al, 2011;Pattanaik and Nadhanael, 2011) Statistical evidence of reasonable stability in the demand for money yielded the income elasticity of money demand of 1.77 as a key operating parameter, with the coefficient on inflation at unity (Rangarajan, 1994 (Rangarajan and Singh, 1984); so the money supply rule in its reduced from consisted of determining the growth of reserve money adjusted for reserve requirements as the monetary authority could determine or at least influence the monetary base even in the presence of fiscal dominance and administered interest rates (Rangarajan, 1985). Ending automatic monetization of fiscal deficits was addressed in the context of central bank autonomy (Rangarajan, 1993) 12 , and over the period 1994-97 it was phased out.…”
Section: India's Monetary Policy Frameworksupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It has recently been argued the Indian AS curve may be backward bending because distortions from inflation reduce effort. RBI (2011 Box 11.4, pp.32) and Pattanaik and Nadhanael (2013) estimate the inflation threshold where such negative effects kick in to be about 5 per cent. But in the theoretical arguments for such a curve, effort decreases with output only after unemployment falls below some critical threshold ( Figure 3 shows the output corresponding to the minimum unemployment rate or MUR).…”
Section: Identifying the As From Indian Growth And Inflation Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sacrifice ratio estimates could also depend upon the prevailing inflation rate. The estimates in this paper assume a linear relationship between inflation and growth, whereas the relationship could be non-linear and subject to threshold effects Pattanaik andNadhanael, 2011).…”
Section: Non-food Manufactured Products Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%