Why popular support tools on climate change adaptation have difficulties in reaching local policy‐makers: Qualitative insights from the UK and Germany

Abstract

Policy support for climate change adaptation has grown rapidly and respective tools (such as online guides and handbooks) have been documented and categorized repeatedly in recent years. Nevertheless, we still know little about how relevant their target groups find them for their work. We aim to address this gap with case studies on two well-known support tools: the "Adaptation Wizard" from the UK and the "Klimalotse" from Germany. After showing how adaptation support tools have spread in recent years, we analyze qualitatively how relevant regional and local policy-makers concerned with adaptation find the two tools. One of our main findings is the following discrepancy:while both tools offer support in developing and implementing comprehensive adaptation plans, local policy-makers find this irrelevant and expect support in coping with imminent climate change impacts, for example, by single adaptation measures. Consequently, the local policy-makers we interviewed hardly use the two tools but seek more specific support, in particular regarding vulnerability and cost-benefit assessments. We conclude that policy support tools lack relevance when their well-intended attempt to enlighten target groups is too remote from what the latter expect.

Decision support platforms for climate change adaptation: an overview and introduction

“…This context can change within the span of time over which a project to produce a platform or decision support resource is conceived and executed. This means that a design for an adaptation platform laid out at the start of the build may need to be adapted during its development, as the original design may no longer be appropriate by the time the project is completed (Porter et al 2015;Clar and Steurer 2018). For example, at the present time in Europe, current requirements on local authorities to adapt mean that the need is for targeted support for modest interventions, for example around cost-benefit analysis, rather than insisting on comprehensive system-wide approaches that the Adaptation Wizard and Klimalotse can support (Clar and Steurer 2018).…”

Data, concepts and methods for large‐n comparative climate change adaptation policy research: A systematic literature review

“…This is compounded by a limited push from the adaptation research community to fund datadriven research as the community itself is still characterized by small-n qualitative research. Research institutions and national funding agencies invest primarily in short-term research projects that are context specific and deliver immediate results such as tools, guidebooks and context specific recommendations even though the effects of these efforts are not always convincing (Burch et al, 2017;Clar & Steurer, 2018).…”

Conversations About Climate Risk, Adaptation and Resilience in Africa

“…While more sophisticated and ambitious use of climate information, tools and decision support systems are attractive and promoted by researchers, they often fail to meet the realities of operational practice. For example, Clar and Steurer ( 2018 ) identified 88 support tools for climate services/adaptation but they had received very limited evaluation. When they examined whether and how the Willows et al ( 2003 ) framework, a tool that had been widely promoted in the UK during the late 1990s and 2000s, was used by local authorities, they found very low levels of awareness and use.…”