2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0007123415000198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Pre-Electoral Coalitions in Presidential Systems?

Abstract: Why do political parties join coalitions to support other parties’ presidential candidates if presidents, once elected, are not bound to their pre-electoral pledges? This article argues that policy agreements made publicly between coalition partners during the campaign help parties pursue policy goals. However, parties cannot use pre-electoral coalitions to secure access to patronage, pork and government benefits under the control of presidents because they cannot hold presidents accountable to these agreement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
14

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
41
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…More research is needed to understand the dynamics of pre-electoral coalition formation in presidential elections (Freudenreich 2013;Machado 2009;Kellam 2015). Pre-electoral negotiations are a very complicated undertaking and often take place behind closed doors.…”
Section: Cabinet Formation and Pre-electoral Commitmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More research is needed to understand the dynamics of pre-electoral coalition formation in presidential elections (Freudenreich 2013;Machado 2009;Kellam 2015). Pre-electoral negotiations are a very complicated undertaking and often take place behind closed doors.…”
Section: Cabinet Formation and Pre-electoral Commitmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors researching the formation of electoral alliances state that alliances form among ideologically compatible parties (Allern and Aylott, 2009;Debus, 2009;Gandhi and Reuter, 2013;Golder, 2006;Greene and Haber, 2016;Ibenskas, 2015;Kellam, 2015;Machado, 2009;Wahman, 2011). Some add to this that alliances among ideologically similar parties are more likely if they have prior experience of cooperation (Debus, 2009;Gandhi and Reuter, 2013;Greene and Haber, 2016;Ibenskas, 2015).…”
Section: Ideological Compatibility and Programmatic Similaritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with ideology, party platforms are also considered to be a factor that influences the formation of alliances. Distinguishing between policy-seeking and office-seeking parties, some authors (Ibenskas, 2015;Kellam, 2015;Spoon and West, 2015;Wahman, 2011) argue that parties that are policy-seeking, i.e. strive to win legislative seats in order to implement their programs, form alliances more often.…”
Section: Ideological Compatibility and Programmatic Similaritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is influenced by the Westminster parliamentary model and its first-past-the-post (FPTP) principle, but the basic arguments have broader application. If tactical voting is found in non-FPTP systems (Riera 2016), similar questions of alliance formation are likely to arise; presidential systems can also be the site of alliances (Kellam 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%