2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Psychiatric Research Must Abandon Traditional Diagnostic Classification and Adopt a Fully Dimensional Scope: Two Solutions to a Persistent Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research data provide further evidence that the treatment decisions for the individual schizophrenic patients are more correct if they are guided by the objectively measured LMPs . Such an objective and quantitative evaluation at a single‐patient level is in line with the modern tendency for personalized and precision medicine in the psychiatric neuroscience research, aimed at replacing the traditional categorical diagnostic approach with a more dimensional one that looks for “theranostic” rather than for diagnostic biomarkers . It is interesting to note that just in the last few years the motor dimension was proposed to be included in the translational psychiatric neuroscience research .…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of the Translational Equilibriometricmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our research data provide further evidence that the treatment decisions for the individual schizophrenic patients are more correct if they are guided by the objectively measured LMPs . Such an objective and quantitative evaluation at a single‐patient level is in line with the modern tendency for personalized and precision medicine in the psychiatric neuroscience research, aimed at replacing the traditional categorical diagnostic approach with a more dimensional one that looks for “theranostic” rather than for diagnostic biomarkers . It is interesting to note that just in the last few years the motor dimension was proposed to be included in the translational psychiatric neuroscience research .…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of the Translational Equilibriometricmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…4,5 Such an objective and quantitative evaluation at a single-patient level is in line with the modern tendency for personalized 36,61,62 and precision 63,64 medicine in the psychiatric neuroscience research, aimed at replacing the traditional categorical diagnostic approach with a more dimensional one 64-68 that looks for "theranostic" 69 rather than for diagnostic biomarkers. 67,68 It is interesting to note that just in the last few years the motor dimension was proposed to be included in the translational psychiatric neuroscience research. 36,65,66 It is noteworthy that instrumental motor measures are capable of detecting subthreshold movement abnormalities that are not detectable to the eye.…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of the Translational Equilibriometrimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The question remains as to whether PCL‐C scores might reflect transdiagnostic distress, burnout, or specific reactions to trauma. Studies designed based on frameworks such as The National Institutes of Health Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) could elucidate how PTSD relates to burnout, compassion fatigue, other disorders, and underlying dimensions of psychopathology …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis in psychology is typically a dichotomous decision, although it is generally acknowledged that many psychological symptoms are dimensional (Hudziak, Achenbach, Althoff, & Pine, ) and psychological disorders do not represent mutually exclusive “natural kinds” (Hengartner & Lehmann, ; Zachar & Kendler, ). Despite calls for dimensional diagnostic systems (e.g., Widiger & Trull, ), practitioners must make dichotomous diagnostic decisions, partially because of the structure of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 5th ed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%