2016
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why quality of life measurement is important in dermatology clinical practice

Abstract: The aim of this study was to describe the many ways in which quality of life (QoL) measurement may potentially be advantageous in routine clinical dermatology practice. Thirteen members of the EADV Task Force on Quality of Life, eight dermatologists, three health psychologists, one epidemiologist and one pharmacoepidemiologist, independently listed all of the ways they thought this may be advantageous. 108 different way of using QoL information in clinical practice were suggested (median per participant=8, ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many reasons to use HRQoL assessment in clinical practice. Members of the EADV Task Force on Quality of Life independently listed the ways they thought that it may be advantageous to measure QoL in routine dermatological clinical practice: a total of 108 different ways of using QoL information in clinical practice were suggested [ 17 ]. The majority of these suggested advantages of measuring QoL are applicable to the routine clinical management of HS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many reasons to use HRQoL assessment in clinical practice. Members of the EADV Task Force on Quality of Life independently listed the ways they thought that it may be advantageous to measure QoL in routine dermatological clinical practice: a total of 108 different ways of using QoL information in clinical practice were suggested [ 17 ]. The majority of these suggested advantages of measuring QoL are applicable to the routine clinical management of HS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lack of placebo-controlled clinical trials with sufficient participant numbers that assess different treatment methods and a lack of high-quality clinical trials in HS patients where HRQoL instruments have been used as outcome measures. The EADV TFs encouraged the further development, validation and use of other HS-specific, dermatology-specific and generic instruments, but such use should be based on the principles presented by the EADV TF on QoL and Patient Oriented Outcomes [ 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. The aim of the present review is to present an update on recent QoL studies in HS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some clinicians use QoL instruments in their routine clinical work, there is very little published about such usage [68]. Van Cranenburgh et al [69] discussed why QoL assessment is relevant for dermatological practice, which patients would benefit most from routine HRQoL assessment and how QoL assessment can be applied in clinical practice.…”
Section: Hrqol Assessment In Routine Dermatology Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were sorted into the following five categories: inform clinical decisions, clinician-patient communication, awareness of skin disease burden, informing the consultation and clinical service administration. The wide range of potential benefits identified may not only encourage clinicians to use these measures, but also highlights many areas requiring evidence to establish the true value of routine use of QoL measures [68]. …”
Section: Hrqol Assessment In Routine Dermatology Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) outlines the approaches necessary for achieving 'high-quality care' (11), stressing the value of 'patient experience' in addition to safe and effective care. The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) also highlights the importance of QoL measurement in dermatology clinical practice, emphasizing various benefits of routine "DLQI Seems to be 'Action', and Skindex-29 Seems to be 'Emotion'": Qualitative Study of the Perceptions of Patients with Psoriasis or Eczema on Two Common Dermatology-specific Quality of Life Measures use of HRQoL measures in routine practice (12). Two frequently used measures are the Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) (13) and the Skindex-29 (14), with others, such as the Dermatology Quality of Life Scales (15), the Dermatology-specific Quality of Life instrument (16), used less often.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%