2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why serve soup with a fork?: How policy coherence for development can link environmental impact assessment with the 2030 agenda for sustainable development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Sustainable Development Goals go beyond traditional linear development relationships by adopting an inclusive approach that promotes interconnectedness, partnerships, and focuses on complex interactions within and between development goals [40]. This is also underlined by the UN [41], stating that the integrated nature of the SDGs is important and should be taken into account in order to achieve them.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Sustainable Development Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sustainable Development Goals go beyond traditional linear development relationships by adopting an inclusive approach that promotes interconnectedness, partnerships, and focuses on complex interactions within and between development goals [40]. This is also underlined by the UN [41], stating that the integrated nature of the SDGs is important and should be taken into account in order to achieve them.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Sustainable Development Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, even if global sustainable agendas and Millennium goals have triggered attention on PC and related operational aspects and concrete targets, in the PC literature two crucial aspects continue to be analytically underestimated: on one hand, the political dimension of the policy process, consisting of priorities selection, divergent interests' composition, policy tools adjustment; on the other, the evaluation effort that consists in monitoring and considering outcomes and impacts. Regarding political dimension, it is the studies on PCD that have more systematically raised the question of development and sustainable development “for whom”: the recognition of Northern bias, that is, donor's policy problem definition, goals and tools selection, is present in this sub‐field of literature (Koff, 2021; Mbanda & Fourie, 2019; Siitonen, 2016; Thede, 2013).…”
Section: Concluding Remarks: the Challenges For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on PC and those focused on policy integration (Candel & Biesbroek, 2016), policy coordination (Peters, 2018), new policy design (Howlett et al, 2015), policy interaction, policy interplay, and policy mixes intersect, and they all deal with compatibility and consistency between goals, instruments, implementation practices, and outcomes in a varied numbers of policy sectors (Rayner &Howlett, 2009). 4 Studies specifically devoted to PC for development (PCD) and sustainable development (PCSD) have focused attention on PC as a policy tool for transformative development, and questioned the feasibility of PC per se, unrelated to normative dimensions of development and sustainable development (Habel, 2020; Koff, 2021; Mbanda & Fourie, 2019; Thede, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing policy coherence and coordination of sustainable development across countries is essential. Policy Coherence for Development, which is considered a pillar of the 2030 Agenda [112], can link different SDGs when used as a methodology [113]. SDG Target 17.14 calls on all countries to "enhance policy coherence for sustainable development" as a key means of implementation.…”
Section: Global Cooperation and Multilateralism Remain The Inevitable Choice For Sdgs Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%