Why service users do not complain or have ‘voice’: a mixed-methods study from Nepal’s rural primary health care system

Abstract

BackgroundDespite abundant literature on the different aspects of health care complaint management systems in high-income countries, little is known about this area in less developed health care systems and most research to date has been conducted in hospital settings. This article seeks to address this gap by reporting on research into complaint systems in primary health care (PHC) settings in Nepal.MethodsUsing a mixed-methods design, qualitative interviews were conducted with key informants (n = 39) and six community focus groups (n = 56), in the Dang District of Nepal. In addition, interviewer-administered structured questionnaire interviews were held with 400 service users, health facility operation and management committee (HFMC) members and service providers from 22 of the 39 public health facilities. Qualitative data were transcribed, organized and then analyzed using the framework method in QSR NVivo 10, while quantitative data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 22.ResultsDespite service users having grievances with the health system, they did not complain frequently: 9% (n = 20) reported ever making complaints about the PHC services. Complaints made were about medicines, health facility opening hours, health facility physical environment, and service providers, and were categorized into environment/equipment, accessibility/availability, level of empathy in the care process and care/safety. Generally, complaints were made verbally to health providers or to HFMC members or female community health volunteers. Use of formal channels such as suggestion boxes or written complaints was almost non-existent. Reasons reported for not complaining included: a lack of complaint channels; lack of knowledge of service entitlements; power asymmetry between service providers and service users; lack of opportunity to choose alternative providers, lack of an established culture of complaining, and a perceived lack of responsiveness to complaints.ConclusionVery few service users made complaints to PHC services in Nepal. Several contextual factors related to the community and the health system were identified as the reasons for not complaining. We recommend continuing efforts to establish proper complaints mechanisms with an increased emphasis on the existing community health system networks. Furthermore, awareness among service users about service entitlements and complaint mechanisms should be increased.

Mothers’ experience of disrespect and abuse during maternity care in northern Ethiopia

“…This may be related to longer observation times in uncomfortable circumstances, which may also cause severe distress and result in negative experiences. Health service users in developing countries generally have insufficient processes in place for appeals, and lengthy labour times provide more opportunities for negative experiences [25]. However, proper incident reporting can lead to improved policies and practices in health facilities and better informed health decision-making by women [26].…”

Protocol: action planning for action research about kaizen in public organizations. The case of higher education

“…Por desgracia los artículos centrados en servicios son escasos (Agmoni, 2016;Audretsch et al, 2011;Baril et al, 2016;Gohary et al, 2016;Gurung et al, 2017;Karel et al, 2017;Schwarz et al, 2017). Quizás uno de los motivos sea que se viene aplicando e investigando durante más de 50 años en el sector industrial (Jaca et al, 2011) y se haya considerado que las organizaciones de servicios no presentan unas características que las diferencien de las empresas industriales en lo que respecta a las variables a afectan a la implantación, desarrollo y mantenimiento de la mejora continua.…”

A meta‐ethnography of the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of patient complaints processes in health‐care settings

“…All 9 studies were reported in high‐income countries, indicating that the findings may not be applicable to low‐ and middle‐income countries. Since completing this meta‐ethnography, qualitative interviews and focus groups in Nepal have identified that barriers to complaints resolution are more often characterized by procedural inadequacies in the complaints system and a heightened power imbalance between service users and providers . Due to the limited volume and broad diversity of included studies (eg, the Swedish studies were restricted to the patient's perspective; the New Zealand studies only considered professionals’ views; the Australian studies were based entirely in secondary care settings), we were unable to draw substantiated generalizations in the differences between countries or health‐care settings.…”