Public Sociology 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315127781-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Sociology Does Not Need to Be Saved: Analytic Reflections on Public Sociologies*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For those sociologists whose focus lies in critiquing the evolution of social movements and in revealing the complexities and moral ambiguities that underpin them, Burawoy's approach not only over-estimates the degree of consensus which exists within the sociological community but risks prioritising the advancement of left-leaning goals over rigorous academic practice (e.g. McLaughlin et al, 2005).…”
Section: What Is Public Sociology?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those sociologists whose focus lies in critiquing the evolution of social movements and in revealing the complexities and moral ambiguities that underpin them, Burawoy's approach not only over-estimates the degree of consensus which exists within the sociological community but risks prioritising the advancement of left-leaning goals over rigorous academic practice (e.g. McLaughlin et al, 2005).…”
Section: What Is Public Sociology?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, public sociology and critical studies coalesce. This imperative is not necessarily fulfilled by direct unmediated relation to the public, in terms of Burawoy’s organic public sociology (and the concerns this raised about harming scholars’ autonomy [McLaughlin et al, 2017, p. 294]), but by raising issues that can facilitate wider policy debates. Therefore, using tools informed by critical studies when performing public labor has analytical advantages in informing deliberation by challenging or undermining presupposed assumptions, even if one rejects the normative commitment of public labor (which Burawoy [2017] reiterated).…”
Section: Engagement With the Publicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burawoy's vision of the typology and "division of labor" in sociology has been the subject of much critique and debate (see Calhoun 2005;Christensen 2013;Ericson 2005;McLaughlin, Kowalchuk, and Turcotte 2005;Nickel 2010;Tittle 2004). Some critics have argued that the typology is indistinct and that Burawoy's delineations between the types of sociology are unhelpful due to significant overlaps in practice (Horowitz 2009); others have questioned the idea that sociology as a discipline is not inherently public (Ericson 2005).…”
Section: Traditional and Organic Public Sociologies And Public(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%