Bioarchaeological and Forensic Perspectives on Violence 2014
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107051409.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why some bodies matter: defacement and narrative in historical forensics cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification and subsequent interment also creates opportunities for commemoration (e.g., Huggins, 2012), thanatourism (Stone, 2006(Stone, , 2012, and exposure to the memento trade (Penfold-Mounce, 2010)(see Rogers [2004] for an interesting take on the latter), while also positioning researchers to speak to the pastness or authenticity of a specimen (Holtorf, 2013;Holtorf and Schadla-Hall, 1999;Jones, 2010). In our work, the successful identification of the Fort King George skull as one of the Georgia Martyrs had the potential to create a relic of the Catholic Church, to sacralize the skull, and to unleash infinite possibilities of theft, worship, contest, and scorn (Duncan and Stojanowski, 2014).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identification and subsequent interment also creates opportunities for commemoration (e.g., Huggins, 2012), thanatourism (Stone, 2006(Stone, , 2012, and exposure to the memento trade (Penfold-Mounce, 2010)(see Rogers [2004] for an interesting take on the latter), while also positioning researchers to speak to the pastness or authenticity of a specimen (Holtorf, 2013;Holtorf and Schadla-Hall, 1999;Jones, 2010). In our work, the successful identification of the Fort King George skull as one of the Georgia Martyrs had the potential to create a relic of the Catholic Church, to sacralize the skull, and to unleash infinite possibilities of theft, worship, contest, and scorn (Duncan and Stojanowski, 2014).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Engaging the subject as a coherent field permits us to connect the practical mechanics of forensics and bioarchaeology (developing biological profiles from human remains) to a corpus of literature that deserves greater consideration, and thus theorize an emerging area of emphasis to the benefit of the field. This is particularly worthwhile because it is an area in which our work by definition articulates with a broad, public audience (Duncan and Stojanowski, 2014).…”
Section: Defining and Delineating A Biohistorical Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%