2000
DOI: 10.1163/156851600750133351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Subjectivity Matters: Critical Theory and the Philosophy of the Subject

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There seems to be a hesitation then about the primacy of constitutive relations. From the perspective of the critics of intersubjectivism, Feuerbach seems to be committing the same fallacy that post‐Hegelians like Habermas and Honneth repeated, as Dieter Henrich and his students famously tried to show (see Freundlieb, , for a good survey of the key protagonists and their arguments). If the ego is said to “become clear to himself and self‐conscious” only through the other, hasn't the ego thereby already been acquainted with itself in the first place?…”
Section: Self‐lovementioning
confidence: 98%
“…There seems to be a hesitation then about the primacy of constitutive relations. From the perspective of the critics of intersubjectivism, Feuerbach seems to be committing the same fallacy that post‐Hegelians like Habermas and Honneth repeated, as Dieter Henrich and his students famously tried to show (see Freundlieb, , for a good survey of the key protagonists and their arguments). If the ego is said to “become clear to himself and self‐conscious” only through the other, hasn't the ego thereby already been acquainted with itself in the first place?…”
Section: Self‐lovementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some commentators question the value of Habermas' deliberative democracy in terms of its incomplete understanding of justice, particularly in substantive terms (Cohen, 1997;Femia, 1996). Others consider it Eurocentric, based on mythical ideals of life-worlds and speech acts (Kaufman, 1999); that it cannot account for the inherent subjectivity of individuals (Freundlieb, 2000); that the basis of Habermas' idea of democracy in an ideal speech act is misguided (Cooren, 2000); as is the failure to account for economic scarcity (Avio, 2000). Some suggest that as a 'cure', Habermas' deliberative democracy is worse than the 'disease', due to its ultimate deference to liberal ideals (Maffetone, 2000).…”
Section: Planning and Democratic Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Za status tako komunikativno preorijentisane paradigme, subjekta i njegove (de)centriranosti unutar nje, videti raspravu:Cooke, 2004;Wellmer, 2004;Freundlieb, 2004;Henrich, 2004;Frank, 2004;Rundell, 2004. …”
unclassified