2013
DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican1113-48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why the Brain Prefers Paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Decreased concentration caused by eye fatigue can be a barrier to successful etext-based learning, as screens can strain the eyes and cause headaches (Jabr 2013). A recent study (Lin, Wang, and Kang 2015) found that both memory and ability performance improved after using paper and pencil, and that eye fatigue was greater when using a tablet.…”
Section: The Benefits Of Print-based Textsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreased concentration caused by eye fatigue can be a barrier to successful etext-based learning, as screens can strain the eyes and cause headaches (Jabr 2013). A recent study (Lin, Wang, and Kang 2015) found that both memory and ability performance improved after using paper and pencil, and that eye fatigue was greater when using a tablet.…”
Section: The Benefits Of Print-based Textsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 A recently published Scientific American article notes that there have been hundreds of studies on reading comprehension differences between print and online, but the results have been mixed as to whether there is a significant difference. 19 Purpose A 2009 comprehensive study by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) in the United Kingdom found that most e-books are consumed in small "chunks," indicating that users were extracting information, and not spending a great deal of time in any one book. 20 The study also found that only about 5% of users spent more than five minutes on a page, and 85% of users spent less than a minute.…”
Section: Age and Grade-levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Mangen et al [13] concluded that the brain has to face additional difficulties which are not present when using a conventional book, such as learning to cope with a text with which we cannot physically interact. Moreover, other works [14,15,16] have shown that physical books provide a sense of control over the text and object manipulation (underlining, bending, etc.) that helps us better understand the text.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%