2012
DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2012.653127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why the Gap? Turkey, EU Accession, Corruption and Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corruption has always been a problem in Turkey (Bak, 2019; Baran, 2000; Kimya, 2019; Ömürgönülşen & Doig, 2012; Soyaltin, 2017). Allegations of corruption are constant in Turkey, especially in the political sphere and related to construction contracts.…”
Section: Evolution Of Corruption In Turkey and Comparison With Other ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corruption has always been a problem in Turkey (Bak, 2019; Baran, 2000; Kimya, 2019; Ömürgönülşen & Doig, 2012; Soyaltin, 2017). Allegations of corruption are constant in Turkey, especially in the political sphere and related to construction contracts.…”
Section: Evolution Of Corruption In Turkey and Comparison With Other ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, as a member of the EU, Turkey would need to agree with other member countries on how to calculate and target agricultural support payments under the CAP. Research suggests that the flow of transfers would be large, and some authors have questioned Turkey's capacity to absorb and manage the transfers in an efficient and transparent way (Oskam et al., ; Ömürgönülşen and Doig, ). Turkey would also need to develop the capacity to implement an expanded series of rules designed to protect the environment, some of which are linked to agricultural support payments (Meyer et al., ) .…”
Section: Policy Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%