2011
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why the IOM recommendations for vitamin D are deficient

Abstract: The IOM recommendations for vitamin D fail in a major way on logic, on science, and on effective public health guidance. Moreover, by failing to use a physiological referent, the IOM approach constitutes precisely the wrong model for development of nutritional policy. ß

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
238
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 333 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
238
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The NAMÕs RDA [defined as the intake likely to ''meet or exceed the needs of about 97.5% of the population'' (7)] is 600 and 800 IU/d for those aged #70 and >70 y, respectively. Supplementation with 1000 IU/d did not meet the NAM target in our participants, a finding that is consistent with the assertion that the RDA may not achieve its target in the general population (64,65). However, this finding was not adjusted for potential confounding (e.g., by season), and our population had special characteristics that may affect generalizability, including a history of colorectal adenoma (but not familial polyposis syndromes), the exclusion of vitamin D-deficient participants (serum 25(OH)D concentration <12 ng/mL), a lower prevalence of minorities (18% compared with 28%), and a higher prevalence of overweight participants (78% compared with 72%) than in the general population (66,67).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The NAMÕs RDA [defined as the intake likely to ''meet or exceed the needs of about 97.5% of the population'' (7)] is 600 and 800 IU/d for those aged #70 and >70 y, respectively. Supplementation with 1000 IU/d did not meet the NAM target in our participants, a finding that is consistent with the assertion that the RDA may not achieve its target in the general population (64,65). However, this finding was not adjusted for potential confounding (e.g., by season), and our population had special characteristics that may affect generalizability, including a history of colorectal adenoma (but not familial polyposis syndromes), the exclusion of vitamin D-deficient participants (serum 25(OH)D concentration <12 ng/mL), a lower prevalence of minorities (18% compared with 28%), and a higher prevalence of overweight participants (78% compared with 72%) than in the general population (66,67).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As discussed in a recent paper, most such studies are anomalous and, when combined with other similar studies, the effect disappears (Grant, 2009f). Several editorials and letters to editors have criticized the IOM report (Grant, 2011b;Heaney and Holick, 2011;Holick, 2011).…”
Section: Multiple Sclerosismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is a consensus that 25(OH)D (calcidiol) is the most abundant metabolite and the best indicator for the evaluation of vitamin D status (A), the indivi duals being classified as: deficient, insufficient of suf ficient in vitamin D (3,6,41,42). On the other hand, there is no consensus regarding the cut off value for the definition of "vitamin D sufficiency" (6,43,44).…”
Section: What Are the Effects On Bone Metabolism?mentioning
confidence: 99%