2019
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why the Therapeutic Impact of RAS Mutation Clearance in Plasma ctDNA Deserves to Be Further Explored in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, liquid biopsies have shown the selective pressure of anti-EGFR therapies in patients with RAS-wild-type * colorectal tumors, in that acquired resistance to EGFR blockade is often driven by the emergence of KRAS/NRAS mutations in plasma [18]. More recently, we and others have reported that in RAS mutant mCRC, the conversion to RAS wild-type * status in plasma is a frequent event, ranging from 8% to 70% of cases according to studies [19][20][21][22][23], supporting that the evolutionary landscape of mCRC can lead to an unexpected negative selection of RAS mutant clones. Nevertheless, whether this conversion might depend on the evolutionary pressure induced by anti-VEGF treatments is still under debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, liquid biopsies have shown the selective pressure of anti-EGFR therapies in patients with RAS-wild-type * colorectal tumors, in that acquired resistance to EGFR blockade is often driven by the emergence of KRAS/NRAS mutations in plasma [18]. More recently, we and others have reported that in RAS mutant mCRC, the conversion to RAS wild-type * status in plasma is a frequent event, ranging from 8% to 70% of cases according to studies [19][20][21][22][23], supporting that the evolutionary landscape of mCRC can lead to an unexpected negative selection of RAS mutant clones. Nevertheless, whether this conversion might depend on the evolutionary pressure induced by anti-VEGF treatments is still under debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquid biopsy-guided genomic studies performed in colorectal cancer have demonstrated a significant increase in RAS mutant clones in plasma at the onset of secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapy [ 11 ]. Similarly, the disappearance of RAS mutant clones in plasma has been demonstrated in a high percentage of patients who failed first-line treatments [ 12 ]. This frequent modulation of RAS mutations at the time of progressive disease had previously been described in leukemia patients as well [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the authors state that "studies with liquid biopsy have been to date selectively focused on the early detection of the appearance of RAS-mt clones in tumor deposits by analyzing ctDNA in blood samples from patients with RAS-wt primary tumors." This is also incorrect, and a comment on other studies currently ongoing on this specific topic 6 would have been appropriate and would have given greater substance to this interesting report.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%