2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.946242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why the Unskilled Are Unaware: Further Explorations of (Absent) Self-Insight Among the Incompetent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maughan (2001) found that graduating seniors had a higher opinion of their ability to access information and to conduct library research than they were able to demonstrate by their test scores. Other researchers confirm the notion that, with regard to assessing their own knowledge and skills, students demonstrated an overconfidence in their abilities (Ehrlinger, Johnson, Banner, Dunning, & Kruger, 2008;Monoi, O'Hanlon, & Diaz, 2005;Ren, 2000). Nursing students in the present study may have expressed overconfidence in their self-appraisal of their information skills, which concurs with the findings of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Maughan (2001) found that graduating seniors had a higher opinion of their ability to access information and to conduct library research than they were able to demonstrate by their test scores. Other researchers confirm the notion that, with regard to assessing their own knowledge and skills, students demonstrated an overconfidence in their abilities (Ehrlinger, Johnson, Banner, Dunning, & Kruger, 2008;Monoi, O'Hanlon, & Diaz, 2005;Ren, 2000). Nursing students in the present study may have expressed overconfidence in their self-appraisal of their information skills, which concurs with the findings of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For example, many people overestimate the superiority of their work performance (Cross, 1977;Haun, Zeringue, Leach, & Foley, 2000;Zenger, 1992), social skills (College Board, 1976-1977Lewinsohn, Mischel, Chaplin, & Barton, 1980;Swann & Gill, 1997), and physical talents (Dunning, Meyerowitz, & Holzberg, 1989;Svenson, 1981; for exceptions, see Kruger, 1999;Moore, 2007). Such overconfidence persists even when the stakes are high and individuals have incentives to estimate their relative abilities accurately (Ehrlinger, Johnson, Banner, Dunning, & Kruger, 2008;Hoelzl & Rustichini, 2005;Williams & Gilovich, 2008).…”
Section: The Origins Of Overconfidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt'' [5]. Quantitative analysis confirms that meta-ignorance scales with primary ignorance: the least competent people display the most overestimation of their own knowledge [1]. The latter symptom may explain the authoritative tone of unsuited reviewers that may captivate the editors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This phenomenon has become known as the Dunning-Kruger effect [1,2], especially when paired with over-confidence. Why is this relevant for the peerreview process?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%