2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why the verbal counting principles are constructed out of representations of small sets of individuals: A reply to Gallistel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This system, known as the 'accumulator model' or 'analogue-magnitude system', is used for estimating how different large numbers compare to each other (Meck and Church 1983;Gallistel and Gelman 2000) and does not require that the individual have access to either a representation of a specific number or to any particular information pertaining to a specific number (Le Corre and Carey 2008). This model is based on the premise that memory is an inherently noisy medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system, known as the 'accumulator model' or 'analogue-magnitude system', is used for estimating how different large numbers compare to each other (Meck and Church 1983;Gallistel and Gelman 2000) and does not require that the individual have access to either a representation of a specific number or to any particular information pertaining to a specific number (Le Corre and Carey 2008). This model is based on the premise that memory is an inherently noisy medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, even preceding this earliest understanding, analysing the activity that children between 30 and 42 months old display when they are requested to gather sets of no more than four objects, there is no alternative but to admit that such young children have interiorized an essential counting understanding (Le Corre & Carey, 2007;Le Corre & Carey, 2008;Sarnecka & Carey, 2008;Sarnecka & Lee, 2009;Villarroel et al, 2009;Wynn, 1992). Furthermore, this primordial counting ability is characterised by the fact that no counting principle is exteriorized until children are able to put together four or more items correctly, almost by subitizing the exact cardinal value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, this point of view is strongly argued by the discontinuous account which, firstly, considers significant verbal counting advents as children's attempt to make sense of the verbal words (rather than as a consequence of an innate mechanism) and, secondly, affords a foremost role in this process to parallel individuation system (Le Corre & Carey, 2007Le Corre et al, 2006). Moreover, this stand is considered the best way to understand the knower-levels phenomenon described during the development of verbal counting (Le Corre & Carey, 2008;Sarnecka & Lee, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations