PsycEXTRA Dataset 2003
DOI: 10.1037/e426952005-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why They Fight: Combat Motivation in the Iraq War

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These environments are very unpredictable for both leaders and researchers, and access to units conducting deployment and combat missions is very limited, particularly in the early stages of engagement (e.g., Wong, Kolditz, Millen, & Potter, 2003).…”
Section: External Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These environments are very unpredictable for both leaders and researchers, and access to units conducting deployment and combat missions is very limited, particularly in the early stages of engagement (e.g., Wong, Kolditz, Millen, & Potter, 2003).…”
Section: External Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Nora Kinzer Stewart's examination of both British and Argentine forces in the Falklands conflict reinforces the primacy of cohesion, morale and motivation in small unit performance in battle. 18 More recently, a study of combat motivation among U.S. Infantrymen and Marines in Operation Iraqi Freedom concludes that "cohesion, or the strong emotional bonds between soldiers, continues to be a critical factor in combat motivation."…”
Section: General (Retired) William Moore Claims the Very Identity Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unit cohesion has been extensively studied by researchers and scholars and the literature indicates that military unit cohesion is task oriented rather than socially focused, thus the members are committed to achieving a shared goal, not concerned with liking each other (Henderson, 1985;Kier 1998;Segal & Kestnbaum, 2002;Wong, Kolditz, Millen, & Potter, 2003). Even when military units have openly gay service members, there have been no negative reports related to unit cohesion (Berube, 1990;Osburn, 1995).…”
Section: Rationale For Homosexual Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%