2013
DOI: 10.1017/s207183220000273x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why We (Still) Need a Revolution

Abstract: This paper posits a (very British!) call to arms, and does so in five steps. In part A, we address the need for constitutional fictions by which the many surrender political power to the few, in the name of stability, order and security. In part B, however, we will show that conflict is both a necessary and a core principle of political constitutionalism—that it is the latent possibility of conflict, the (re)awkening of the many where the few abuse that power, that acts as the final check on government. In par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of these developments, it is necessary to focus on how the EU's particular brand of dual constitutionalism has evolved politically, beyond formal black-letter legal intricacies (Bellamy 2007). A political reading of constitutionalism regards constitutional rules and practices as the product of political actors participating in an on-going development; the actors involved (courts, elected officials, parties, and citizens), are constitutional agents taking part in constitutional agency (Goldoni and McCorkindale 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of these developments, it is necessary to focus on how the EU's particular brand of dual constitutionalism has evolved politically, beyond formal black-letter legal intricacies (Bellamy 2007). A political reading of constitutionalism regards constitutional rules and practices as the product of political actors participating in an on-going development; the actors involved (courts, elected officials, parties, and citizens), are constitutional agents taking part in constitutional agency (Goldoni and McCorkindale 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%