2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00528-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why We Twitter: An Analysis of a Microblogging Community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
151
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
151
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…1b. The in-degree distribution (inset) shows a power-law decay p i ∼ i −2.06 over a large range of in-degrees (the powerlaw exponents are estimated by the method in [7]); however, the out-degree distribution clearly shows a departure from the power-law nature that was observed by measurements on Twitter before the restriction was imposed [10,12]. Now, the power-law p j ∼ j −1.92 for the out-degrees below the point of restriction is followed by a sharp spike at around out-degree j = 2000, and a rapid decay in the distribution beyond this point.…”
Section: Empirical Measurements On the Twitter Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1b. The in-degree distribution (inset) shows a power-law decay p i ∼ i −2.06 over a large range of in-degrees (the powerlaw exponents are estimated by the method in [7]); however, the out-degree distribution clearly shows a departure from the power-law nature that was observed by measurements on Twitter before the restriction was imposed [10,12]. Now, the power-law p j ∼ j −1.92 for the out-degrees below the point of restriction is followed by a sharp spike at around out-degree j = 2000, and a rapid decay in the distribution beyond this point.…”
Section: Empirical Measurements On the Twitter Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…joining of new users, creation of new social links) by the preferential attachment model [4] which has been experimentally shown to occur in several OSNs [13,15]. Also, it produces power-law degree distributions similar to the empirical distributions in Twitter before the restriction was imposed [10,12]. Our proposed model is a customized version of the network-growth model proposed by Krapivsky et.…”
Section: Modeling Restricted Growth Dynamics Of Osnsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mislove et al measure the structure of Flickr, YouTube, LiveJournal, and Orkut [22], and observe the growth of the Flickr social network [21]. Java et al study the topological and geographical properties of Twitter [13]. Huang et al measure user prestige and visible interaction preference in Renren [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%