2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why weight? Analytic approaches for large-scale population neuroscience data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the survey data are augmented with other data sources, such as administrative records or biomarkers, participants who do and do not occur in both data sources may systematically differ . To achieve unbiased population representation with these data, an additional adjustment to the standard weight may be needed …”
Section: Limitations Of Population Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the survey data are augmented with other data sources, such as administrative records or biomarkers, participants who do and do not occur in both data sources may systematically differ . To achieve unbiased population representation with these data, an additional adjustment to the standard weight may be needed …”
Section: Limitations Of Population Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 To achieve unbiased population representation with these data, an additional adjustment to the standard weight may be needed. 9 Weighting improves the overall population estimates, but the weighted estimators for small geographic areas or rare population subgroups may not be representative or stable. Model-based approaches are preferable in these cases, whereby analysts explicitly include design features in prediction modeling and stabilize small area estimation by borrowing information via a multilevel structure.…”
Section: Limitations Of Population Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ABCD study sample was recruited via methods that sought to reduce selection bias, but the resulting data are not meant to be representative of all US youth ( Garavan et al, 2018 ). Although the sample is diverse and generally mirrors the US population in race/ethnicity characteristics, the sample is also more educated, has more children from married caregivers, and higher income than the average US household ( Gard et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As neuroimaging data from future ABCD waves are released, future studies should disentangle causal effects and assess how the spatially divergent effects of SER unfold longitudinally across development. Second, SER scores in the ABCD Study are overall higher compared to the national population, an issue that is further exacerbated by our exclusion criteria (e.g., cutoffs for excessive head motion) (96,97); thus, caution should be exercised when attempting to generalize our findings to the broader population in the United States and worldwide. Lastly, in our previous multivariate study of SER (18), granular analyses demarcated that parental education was the primary factor related to functional connectivity (compared to family income-to-needs and neighborhood disadvantage).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%