2003
DOI: 10.1007/s12147-003-0008-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why women don’t report sexual harassment: A case study of an elite military institution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the results of this study, a small number of women (4/26) who had personally experienced sexual harassment uniformly found the formal reporting process surrounding harassment to be counterproductive and expressed several concerns regarding the negative repercussions of reporting harassment. Significantly, these concerns are consistent with previous research identifying similar issues raised by women in military settings related to the reporting of sexual harassment to authorities (Davis & Thomas, 1998;Firestone & Harris, 1999;Pershing, 2003). Congruent with past research, the women in this study identified threats to their safety, ostracism/social isolation, maligned reputation, and a lack of trust in the formal chain of command as concerns surrounding the reporting of harassment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the results of this study, a small number of women (4/26) who had personally experienced sexual harassment uniformly found the formal reporting process surrounding harassment to be counterproductive and expressed several concerns regarding the negative repercussions of reporting harassment. Significantly, these concerns are consistent with previous research identifying similar issues raised by women in military settings related to the reporting of sexual harassment to authorities (Davis & Thomas, 1998;Firestone & Harris, 1999;Pershing, 2003). Congruent with past research, the women in this study identified threats to their safety, ostracism/social isolation, maligned reputation, and a lack of trust in the formal chain of command as concerns surrounding the reporting of harassment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the U.S. military context, for instance, three major sexual assault scandals have occurred in the past 20 years: the Tailhook scandal in 1991, the Aberdeen scandal in 1996, and the U.S. Air Force Academy scandal in 2003. In all three scandals, U.S. military officers were charged with sexually assaulting civilian and/or military women or engaging in indecent conduct (Department of Defense, 1996;Pershing, 2003). Importantly, when sexual harassment survey responses from U.S. military participants in 1988 were compared to responses from 1995, it was found that sexual harassment reports had declined over time, from 1988 (73.3%) to 1995 (59.1%) among women (Holden & Davis, 2001).…”
Section: Sexual Harassment In the Military: A Closer Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The support available and general climate for OEF/OIF sexual trauma survivors is thus markedly different from those of survivors in previous eras. That said, some victims may still perceive there to be a code of silence around these issues and choose to not report their victimization experiences or seek help because they believe that nothing will be done or that they will experience repercussions for speaking up (Pershing, 2003).…”
Section: Limited Social Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%