2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide binaries in planetary nebulae withGaiaDR2

Abstract: Context. Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) was used to select a sample of 211 central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPNe) with good quality astrometric measurements, that we refer to as GAPN, Golden Astrometry Planetary Nebulae. Gaia astrometric and photometric measurements allowed us to derive accurate distances and radii, and to calculate luminosities with the addition of self-consistent literature values. Such information was used to plot the position of these stars in a Hertzsprung-Russel (HR) diagram and to study … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A small number of PNe have eclipsing binary nuclei (see Section 6); astrophysical analyses of these systems provide additional distance estimates (F16, Table 3). González-Santamaría et al (2020) found eight wide binaries (including one triple system) among their good-quality Gaia DR2 distance sample described in GS19. Most recently, GS21 detected three further possible wide binary systems in their EDR3 sample, including the Ring Nebula (NGC 6720).…”
Section: Primary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A small number of PNe have eclipsing binary nuclei (see Section 6); astrophysical analyses of these systems provide additional distance estimates (F16, Table 3). González-Santamaría et al (2020) found eight wide binaries (including one triple system) among their good-quality Gaia DR2 distance sample described in GS19. Most recently, GS21 detected three further possible wide binary systems in their EDR3 sample, including the Ring Nebula (NGC 6720).…”
Section: Primary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We find that only with a careful examination of every PN and CSPN candidate on an individual basis and by using all the power of multi-wavelength imagery and other pertinent data in HASH can proper evaluations be made and more reliable CSPN be identified. This appears to be true for both [2] and Gaia [10][11][12][13], where our results show some potential issues with correct CSPN identification. Fuller details and work on this topic will be the subject of a paper by Parker et al, which is in preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Nevertheless, unlike for [2], no astrometric problems were found. Others [10][11][12][13] have been using Gaia Early Release data to identify CSPN, with [12] reporting results for 1725 Galactic CSPN based on Gaia EDR3 data. However, from our HASH study it is clear that there may be problems with these Gaia CSPN compilations, as Figure 3 clearly shows for PN 'Outers 2 (HASH ID #10957), where the available PanSTARRs and SDSS irg imagery reveals the true blue CSPN that is also right at the geometric center of the PN.…”
Section: Comparisons With the Gaia Astrometric Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article is an extension of our previous studies on the Galactic planetary nebulae (PNe) population using Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2): González-Santamaría et al (2019) (Paper I) and González-Santamaría et al (2020) (Paper II). Here, we make use of the recently published Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) archive, which provides a greater quantity of higher quality astrometric and photometric data that allow us to update and Full Tables A.1 and A.2 are only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http: //cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/A+A/656/A51 enlarge our PNe catalogue and analyse its results in greater detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%