Wide-domain<i>r</i>-effects in English

Harris, John

doi:10.1017/s0022226712000369

Cited by 24 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They can be found in models of ternary stress (Rice 1992, Caballero 2008, Martínez-Paricio 2012, in preparation), prosodic morphology (McCarthy 1982, Yu 2004, segmental phonotactics (Hammond 1997, Jensen 2000, Davis & Cho 2003, Harris 2013 and tone (Leer 1985c, Morén-Duolljá 2013. They can be found in models of ternary stress (Rice 1992, Caballero 2008, Martínez-Paricio 2012, in preparation), prosodic morphology (McCarthy 1982, Yu 2004, segmental phonotactics (Hammond 1997, Jensen 2000, Davis & Cho 2003, Harris 2013 and tone (Leer 1985c, Morén-Duolljá 2013.…”

Section: Coda [H]-epenthesis Only Targets Initial Syllables Of Ftmaxmentioning

confidence: 99%

The uniqueness of metrical structure: rhythmic phonotactics in Huariapano

Bennett

2013

Phonology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article argues that, contrary to some recent proposals, a given phonological form may be organised into at most one array of metrical structure at a time. The bulk of the paper is dedicated to a case study of Huariapano, a language that has been claimed to motivate multiple, coexisting but autonomous, layers of metrical parsing. I show that this conclusion is premature : both stress and segmental patterning in Huariapano can be modelled within a single system of constituency, once context-dependent variation in foot form is taken into account. The reanalysis developed here also draws on the idea that foot-initial syllables may be targeted by augmentation or fortition processes even when unstressed. Independent evidence for foot-initial strengthening is furnished by segmental phonotactics in a range of other languages.

show abstract

Section: Coda [H]-epenthesis Only Targets Initial Syllables Of Ftmaxmentioning

confidence: 99%

The uniqueness of metrical structure: rhythmic phonotactics in Huariapano

Bennett

2013

Phonology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cells can be introduced to the system in two common ways: first by pre-mixing them into the ECM solution before injection [37] , or second, through the use of peripheral access channels that are separated from the main channel with small constrictions [35] . Including cells in the gel precursor solution limits the extent to which we can further modify fiber properties because changing solution pH, ionic strength, composition, and polymerization temperature can cause cell damage [38][39][40] . To overcome these limitations, we demonstrate two methods of accessing the microengineered collagen landscape.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The control over fluid paths can facilitate the formation of multi-material interfaces by exploiting laminar flows and differences in the viscosities of injected solutions. Here, we demonstrated control over structural properties but our approach can be combined with other established collagen tuning techniques such as controlling ionic strength and pH [38,39] and adding molecular crowders to increase the local density of the collagen fibers [49] .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microengineered three-dimensional collagen fiber landscapes with independently tunable anisotropy and directionality

Ahmed

Joshi

Mansouri

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fibrillar collagen is abundant in the extracellular matrix (ECM), and cellular processes including differentiation, proliferation, and migration, have been linked to the directionality and degree of alignment (anisotropy) of collagen fibers. Given the importance of cell-substrate interactions in driving biological functions, several microfluidic approaches have been developed to create threedimensional (3D) collagen gels with defined fiber properties that enable quantitative correlations between structural cues and observed cell responses. Although existing microfluidic methods provide excellent control over collagen fiber anisotropy, independent control over both fiber direction and anisotropy (that we collectively refer to as the "collagen landscape") has not been demonstrated. Therefore, to advance collagen microengineering capabilities, we present a userfriendly approach that uses fluid flows to create well-defined collagen landscapes within a microfluidic channel network. These landscapes include: i) control over fiber anisotropy, ii) spatial gradients in fiber anisotropy, and iii) defined fiber directionality. Finally, we present two approaches to simplify procedures to allow cell interaction with the microengineered collagen landscapes.

show abstract

“…Harris (1985Harris ( , 2006) also records PreRD for /l/ in Mid-Ulster English, as in pillar ["pIl1 "], but this is not present in TyrE. Thus we find pronunciations such as try [t1 |aÚe], dry [d1 |aÚe], street [st1 |it], entry ["En1 t1 |e], better ["bEt1 "], wonder ["wç· 6 n1 d1 "] and dinner ["dən1 "] used by conservative speakers of Tyrone English (TyrE) in Northern Ireland.…”

Section: Pre-r Dentalisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Harris (1985Harris ( , 2006) also records PreRD for /l/ in Mid-Ulster English, as in pillar ["pIl1 "], but this is not present in TyrE. This PRE-R DENTALISATION (PreRD) has a number of intriguing linguistic properties, in particular an associated /r/-REALISATION EFFECT and a MORPHEME BOUNDARY CONSTRAINT.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pre-R Dentalisation in northern England

Maguire

2012

English Language and Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental pronunciation of alveolar consonants before /r/ and /ər/ is a well-known feature of traditional varieties of Irish English. This PRE-R DENTALISATION (PreRD) has a number of intriguing linguistic properties, in particular an associated /r/-REALISATION EFFECT and a MORPHEME BOUNDARY CONSTRAINT. It is less well known that PreRD is (or perhaps was) also a feature of a number of English varieties outside Ireland, particularly in traditional northern English dialects. This article analyses dialect data from northern England in order to determine the nature of PreRD there and its historical relations with the phenomenon in Irish English. In addition, it explores the phonological complexities of PreRD in light of the loss of rhoticity in traditional northern English dialects. Pre-R DentalisationDental pronunciation of (general English, ?underlying, ?historical) alveolar nonsibilant consonants before /r/ and /ər/ is a well-known (and indeed stereotyped) feature of traditional varieties of Irish English. Thus we find pronunciations such as try [t1 |aÚe], dry [d1 |aÚe], street [st1 |it], entry ["En1 t1 |e], better ["bEt1 "], wonder ["wç· 6 n1 d1 "] and dinner ["dən1 "] used by conservative speakers of Tyrone English (TyrE) in Northern Ireland. 2 This PRE-R DENTALISATION (henceforth PreRD) is a pan-Irish English feature, having been reported from locations as linguistically and geographically diverse as Wexford see also Harris 1985: 211-18 for a critical analysis), which has 1 I would like to thank Patrick Honeybone and two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments on this article. Any remaining deficiencies are, of course, of my own making. 2 Tyrone English data are from ongoing research on the variety by the present author. Harris (1985Harris ( , 2006) also records PreRD for /l/ in Mid-Ulster English, as in pillar ["pIl1 "], but this is not present in TyrE. 3 In Southern Irish English (but not Northern Irish English), PreRD of original /t/ and /d/ has resulted in phonemic split and merger with original /θ/ and /ð/, since the English dental fricatives, /θ/ and /ð/, have also become dental stops in all environments (Wells 1982: 429-31). Since this article deals with varieties where this is not the case, I do not discuss this aspect of Southern Irish English PreRD further. 362WA R R E N M AG U I R E (phonemic) contrasts between 'broad' dental /t d n l/ and 'slender' (palato-)alveolar /t´d´n´l´/. Furthermore, PreRD has a number of intriguing linguistic properties, in particular an associated /r/-REALISATION EFFECT (henceforth RRE), and a MORPHEME BOUNDARY CONSTRAINT (henceforth MBC). PreRD in Irish English is often associated with tapped (and possibly trilled) pronunciations of /r/, as in TyrE try [t1 |aÚe] vs cry [k®aÚe]. The RRE has been recorded in varieties of Ulster Scots (Gregg 1985), in Mid-Ulster English generally (Harris 1985), in Donegal Gaeltacht English (Ní Ghallchóir 1981, and in Wexford (Ó Muirithe 1996). Since the RRE is also present after /θ/ and /ð/ in those northern Irish English varieties w...

show abstract

Wide-domainr-effects in English

Cited by 24 publications

References 63 publications

The uniqueness of metrical structure: rhythmic phonotactics in Huariapano

The uniqueness of metrical structure: rhythmic phonotactics in Huariapano

Microengineered three-dimensional collagen fiber landscapes with independently tunable anisotropy and directionality

Pre-R Dentalisation in northern England

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About