2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide resection versus curettage in giant cell tumor with pathological fracture? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Wide resection and curettage in patients of giant cell tumor with pathological fracture has difference in local recurrence rates. However the presence of a pathological fracture should no be only influential factor in the decision making to perform wide resection or curettage. A proper planning and judicious approach is required in giant cell tumor with pathological fracture for deciding the appropriate treatment method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, other recent studies have also shown that pathological fractures are not a risk factor for recurrence, and the presence of a pathological fracture should not preclude the decision to perform curettage [18]. A meta-analysis showed that it has difference in local recurrence rates, but the difference in the risk of local recurrence did not reach statistical signi cance in the wide resection group compared to curettage group [19], and the meta-analysis suggest the presence of a pathological fracture should not be only in uential factor in the decision making to perform wide resection or curettage. In our study, all patients in 3D-printed group underwent curettage before reconstruction of the articular surface, and satisfactory tumor control was achieved during the mean follow-up compared with the EPR group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…At the same time, other recent studies have also shown that pathological fractures are not a risk factor for recurrence, and the presence of a pathological fracture should not preclude the decision to perform curettage [18]. A meta-analysis showed that it has difference in local recurrence rates, but the difference in the risk of local recurrence did not reach statistical signi cance in the wide resection group compared to curettage group [19], and the meta-analysis suggest the presence of a pathological fracture should not be only in uential factor in the decision making to perform wide resection or curettage. In our study, all patients in 3D-printed group underwent curettage before reconstruction of the articular surface, and satisfactory tumor control was achieved during the mean follow-up compared with the EPR group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although most recurrences were reported to occur within 3 yr of curettage,4,15,17–19 in rare instances the recurrence may develop many years or even decades after elimination of the original lesion 9,20–22. However, late recurrence of GCTB should arouse suspicion of increased risk of malignant transformation 23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 A meta-analysis showed a difference in local recurrence rates, but the difference in the risk of local recurrence between the wide resection group and curettage group did not reach statistical significance. 25 Moreover, the meta-analysis suggested that the presence of a pathological fracture should not be the only influencing factor in the decision to perform wide resection or curettage. In our study, all patients in the 3D-printed group underwent curettage before reconstruction of the articular surface, and satisfactory tumor control was achieved during the mean follow-up compared with the TKR group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%