2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide spread zeolitization of the Neogene – Quaternary volcanic tuff in Jordan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical analysis of the adsorbent (Table 1) shows that (SiO 2 + Al 2 O 3 ) represents 80 wt.% of the mineral. The SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 ratio is 4.02; this value controls the formation of zeolites, which is close to the lower limit for mordenite given by the literature at 4.15–5.15 (Hernáandez et al , 2000; Khoury et al , 2015). Biotite, hematite and feldspar are accessory minerals and affect the colour of the tuff (Bouzidi et al , 2014) because these minerals contain transition metals such as Fe 2+ , Ti 3+ or Mn 2+ .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The chemical analysis of the adsorbent (Table 1) shows that (SiO 2 + Al 2 O 3 ) represents 80 wt.% of the mineral. The SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 ratio is 4.02; this value controls the formation of zeolites, which is close to the lower limit for mordenite given by the literature at 4.15–5.15 (Hernáandez et al , 2000; Khoury et al , 2015). Biotite, hematite and feldspar are accessory minerals and affect the colour of the tuff (Bouzidi et al , 2014) because these minerals contain transition metals such as Fe 2+ , Ti 3+ or Mn 2+ .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We offered some references related to the I.E., Tsitsishvili et al , 2017Rodríguez-Iznaga et al 2022;Córdova-Rodríguez et al 2014;Akimkhan, 2012;Milan et al 2006;Leyva et al 2005;Inglezakis et al, 2002;Townsend, 1986. 3.2 Mormon et al 2018;Khoury et al 2015;Abniki et al 2012;Shinzato et al 2008;Machiels et al 2006;Cerri et al (2001); Minato et al Hernández et al 2000;Langella et al 1999;Tsitsishvili et al 1999;Mumpton, 1977;Mason and Sand, 1960;Franco, 1952. The proposed genetic models of zeolite deposits include weathering, diagenesis in open or closed hydrological systems, low-temperature hydrothermal systems, primary magmatic environments, and impact craters. Most of the occurrences of zeolite occur in one of the following geological environments: saline or alkaline lakes, alkaline soils, diagenetic, open system, hydrothermal and marine sediments, or by the alteration of volcanic glass, as mentioned by Costafreda 2014;Luz, 1995;Clifton, 1987;Sheppard, 1975.…”
Section: Ion Exchange (Ie)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it might be envisaged their use in a number of favorable geological context where zeolitite should be largely available. We can consider for instance: oceanic volcanic islands (like Hawaiian and Canary islands [45]), specially "old" mature volcanic islands where chemically evolved magmas erupt in form of large-sized pyroclastic rocks [47]; pristine arcisland environments or thin immature continental crustal segments (like large segments in the Panamá-Guatemala region in Centro America); in pyroclastic sectors of the large intraplate ood basalt regions [48] or other within plate large basaltic outcrops [49,50]; and of course in the only case of emerged mid-ocean ridge, Iceland (where widespread hydrothermal metamorphism in zeolite facies is well exposed in the marginal, older, eroded sectors of the island [51]). Thus, we can conclude that there is not availability a reason for the margination of phillipsite-chabazite zeolitites from industrial uses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%