IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 1995 Digest
DOI: 10.1109/aps.1995.530083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wideband ridge waveguide radiating element for phased array antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we propose a new antenna element type based on the open-ended ridge gap waveguide (RGW) that aims to overcome the above-mentioned limitations. The starting point of this design is a traditional ridge waveguide (WG) element which has been widely used in arrays at microwave frequencies [15], [16]. However, at high mm-wave frequencies, these hollow metal designs are rare due to the increased manufacturing complexity and the above-explained difficulties of electronics integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we propose a new antenna element type based on the open-ended ridge gap waveguide (RGW) that aims to overcome the above-mentioned limitations. The starting point of this design is a traditional ridge waveguide (WG) element which has been widely used in arrays at microwave frequencies [15], [16]. However, at high mm-wave frequencies, these hollow metal designs are rare due to the increased manufacturing complexity and the above-explained difficulties of electronics integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, we have demonstrated several full-metal PAAs based on the open-ended ridge gap waveguide (RGW) [8], [9]. In general, open-ended ridge waveguide (WG) PAAs have been widely applied for microwave frequency radar applications [10]. However, their hollow metal structure significantly increases manufacturing complexity at 100+ GHz frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the element aperture area could be 1.5 times that of the rectangular waveguide. The reason that the ridged waveguide element is seldom utilized is due to the high active reflection coefficient encountered [4,5,6] and the absence of an effective way to improve the scan match. This is partly caused by the comparatively narrow widths of the ridges used in these designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%