2009
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Widening access? Characteristics of applicants to medical and dental schools, compared with UCAS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sixty-six students completed the questionnaire twice (pre-and post-behavioural science course), giving a response rate of 75%. The gender ratio of responders (46 females, 20 males) was slightly higher than the School's usual ratio of female to male students and that of UK dental schools as a whole (32). In total, there were 11 female and 11 male non-responders, and there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between genders in their response rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Sixty-six students completed the questionnaire twice (pre-and post-behavioural science course), giving a response rate of 75%. The gender ratio of responders (46 females, 20 males) was slightly higher than the School's usual ratio of female to male students and that of UK dental schools as a whole (32). In total, there were 11 female and 11 male non-responders, and there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between genders in their response rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The medical student population is not representative of the UK population as a whole. Available information suggests that applicants from poorer socio‐economic backgrounds remain under‐represented for multiple reasons, 1 which are likely to include limited educational opportunity, resulting in under‐achievement, lack of role models, inadequate support from family and schools, and sometimes active discouragement from friends and peers 2,3 . These pressures can erode able students’ abilities to perceive themselves as potential future doctors 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both medicine and dentistry attract, and admit a higher proportion of students from socially advantaged backgrounds, albeit that dentistry has done rather better in attracting students from state schools than its medical counterparts. 6 There is limited evidence from medicine that graduate entry programmes are having success in increasing the representation of students who haven't traditionally entered higher education in several institutions. Powis et al 7 suggested that graduate entry programmes in medicine have increased the diversity of the student body and highlighted the closer match between the background of medical graduate entry students and the general population when a comparison is made with traditional five-year programmes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research to date has considered applicants and/or successful applicants to dentistry as a whole. 6,[9][10][11] In recent years dentistry has proved attractive to ethnic minority applicants, particularly Asian applicants, while black students are under-represented when compared with the UCAS applicant population as a whole. 6 Dentistry also tends to attract more applicants from selective and independent schools and also a greater proportion of those from higher socioeconomic groups when compared with those applying to higher education generally, albeit to a lesser extent than medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%