Wider Europe, Greater Europe? David Mitrany on European Security Order

Abstract

How should the structure of European security be reorganized following the conflict in Ukraine? Some respond that the European Union should not bend to Russia's acts of aggression. Others blame the allegedly exclusionary and expansive nature of the Euro-Atlantic organizations for the conflict. This paper embeds these competing narratives in the functional approach of David Mitrany, specifically in his two distinctive forms of regional integration, one exclusive and one inclusive. At the same time, however, the paper cautions against drawing simplified conclusions based on the parallels between Mitrany's ideal types of regional integration and contemporary arguments about the place of Russia in European security governance. Indeed, a more inclusive approach to Russia can potentially be beneficial for European security order, but there are more problems with this vision than simply the short-sightedness of western institutions. Unfortunately, Mitrany's functional approach does not offer immediate solutions to these problems.

One Europe or None? Monism, Involution and Relations with Russia

“…The argument presented here suggests that the root cause of the Second Cold War is the failure to provide an institutional or ideational framework for a continental vision of Europe (Zwolski 2016). The 'little Europe' represented by the EU claimed a normative and geographical superiority-as the embodiment of the ideals and aspirations of Europe 'whole and free' (Crouch & Marquand 1992, p. 1).…”

Beyond Freezing? The EU’s Targeted Sanctions against Russia's Political and Economic Elites, and their Implementation and Further Tightening in Germany

“…Zwolski (Zwolski, 2017) outlined the two competing positions derived from this debate: firstly, Europe "threatened by expansionist Russia" which is linked to more assertive EU responses to this threat. Sakwa (Sakwa, 2015) links this with the idea of Europe in the wider sense, and the EU subsumed in a wider Atlantic community.…”

Beyond the Involution of Europe? Monism and Relations with Russia. Part 1

“…Именно поэтому в настоящее время мы и стали свидетелями нескончаемого потока взаимных обвинений, озвучиваемых представителями Москвы, Брюсселя, Киева, Варшавы и Вашингтона, причем большая часть этих обвинений и обид носит абсолютно иррациональный характер и опирается на огромный массив «альтернативных фактов» в сочетании с полным пренебрежением поисками объективной истины. На наш взгляд, коренной причиной новой холодной войной стала вопиющая неспособность ключевых европейских акторов к созданию прочной и взаи-мовыгодной институционально-идеологической основы для объединения всего европейского континента [Zwolski 2016]. Данная ситуация усугублялась еще и тем, что «Малая Европа» в лице ЕС самым очевидным образом претендовала на нормативную и геополитическую гегемонию в рамках региона, позиционируя собственную политику в качестве окончательного воплощения идеалов и устремлений всей «объединенной и свободной» Европы [Towards a Greater... 1992: 1].…”