Wie geht es weiter mit dem soziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus?

Kirchner, Stefan; Krüger, Anne K.; Meier, Frank; Meyer, Uli

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-07330-5_11

Cited by 18 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sowohl Praxis- (Ortmann et al 2000) als auch Systemtheorie (Luhmann 2000) haben ausgearbeitete, sowohl gesellschafts-als auch sozialtheoretisch eingebettete Konzepte der Organisation anzubieten. Der soziologische Neo-Institutionalismus müsste vorab noch ein dezidiert institutionalistisches Konzept der Organisation ausarbeiten, wie verschiedentlich angemerkt wurde (King et al 2010;Kirchner et al 2015). Eine transparentere Verbindung elaborierter Organisations-und Netzwerktheorien könnte weitere Schritte auf dem Weg zu einem differenzierten Bild der Bedeutung von Netzwerken zwischen Organisationen für heutige Vergesellschaftung ermöglichen.…”

Section: Konsequenzenunclassified

Netzwerke zwischen Organisationen. Theoretische Perspektiven der Governanceforschung

Jungmann¹

2020

Handbuch Organisationssoziologie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dieser Beitrag thematisiert Netzwerke zwischen Organisationen als spezifische Koordinationsform. Er greift organisationssoziologische Forschungen zur Governance-Debatte der Netzwerkforschung auf und fokussiert drei unterschiedliche Möglichkeiten ihrer theoretischen Fundierung. Eingeführt werden die Entstehung und zentrale Stoßrichtung der Debatte. Sodann werden die international etablierten Perspektiven des soziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus und der Praxistheorie nach Anthony Giddens sowie das konzeptionelle Angebot der neueren Systemtheorie vorgestellt. Abschließend diskutiere ich aktuelle Forschungsbereiche und zukünftige Herausforderungen.

show abstract

Section: Konsequenzenunclassified

Netzwerke zwischen Organisationen. Theoretische Perspektiven der Governanceforschung

Jungmann¹

2020

Handbuch Organisationssoziologie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hüther and Krücken (2016b) suggest that for universities, the environment might be the most important part to study within a sociological neo-institutionalism perspective. Additional to this suggestion, we will respond to the critique that more theories about actions and practices concerning institutional genesis and changes on the micro-level are needed (Kirchner et al, 2015). Subsequently, for explaining interdependencies between structures, actors, demands and constraints, we follow the idea that introducing sustainability reporting is a part of the organisational changes within universities.…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Structural key factors of participatory sustainability reporting for universities

Klußmann

Sassen²,

Gansel

2019

IJSHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to answer the following research question: What are the key factors of the participatory process for establishing sustainability reporting in German universities? Design/methodology/approach To answer the research question, this study uses qualitative methodology, following the grounded theory approach and triangulation of qualitative methods for accessing data. Findings The findings show that universities face a high level of difficulty in introducing sustainability reporting, which has an external and an internal dimension. Originality/value This paper contributes to the understanding of sustainability reporting processes of universities from an internal perspective, specifically through experts who are involved in the preparation of sustainability reports. Furthermore, it delivers insights for a theory-based discussion, which may support universities in starting sustainability reporting activities and improving reporting processes.

show abstract

“…As has been critically noted, however, a micro-perspective might be incompatible with a general research frame that still tends to overlook individual actors (cf. Powell and Colyvas 2008;Hasse and Schmidt 2010;Kirchner et al 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Envisioning the World: Mapping and Making the Global

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mapping and making the global through practices of observationVisions of the world and descriptions of the global are based on practices of observation. Rather than working with an account of structures and connections, or with a fixed definition of 'the global', the contributions in this book seek to identify narratives, images and models that are used in practices of observation in order to address 'the world' or 'the global' and how they come to appear as a distinct realm of the social world. In addition to considering the conditions for the 'emergence' of the global in particular practices of observation, this book is also interested in the impact of these global modes of observation on field-related discourses, processes and agents. It focuses, therefore, on the phenomenological dimension of globalization processes. The individual contributions reconstruct how specific visions of the world emerge in different social fields and how various actors throughout time have tried to map, describe and make sense of the global, thereby contributing to its constitution, that is, to its 'making'.This book brings together views from Sociology, History, Literary Theory and International Relations and takes up a range of discussions in world society/world polity as well as in global history research. Many disciplines involved in the field of globalization research are witnessing an increased interest in approaches that pursue the process of globalization at the level of local practices, discourses and strategies. Diverse as the disciplinary, theoretical and empirical backgrounds of the contributions gathered here may be, they converge in the effort to retrace 'practices of world making' (Bell 2013: 257) in various areas of society. The aim is to establish a connection between different areas in order to find underlying commonalities in observational practices that are not evident at first glance and consequently little addressed in the

show abstract

Wie geht es weiter mit dem soziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus?

Cited by 18 publications

References 36 publications

Netzwerke zwischen Organisationen. Theoretische Perspektiven der Governanceforschung

Netzwerke zwischen Organisationen. Theoretische Perspektiven der Governanceforschung

Structural key factors of participatory sustainability reporting for universities

Envisioning the World: Mapping and Making the Global

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About