2021
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2021-281
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WIFF1.0: A hybrid machine-learning-based parameterization of Wave-Induced sea-ice Floe Fracture

Abstract: Abstract. Ocean surface waves play an important role in maintaining the marginal ice zone, a heterogenous region occupied by sea ice floes with variable horizontal sizes. The location, width, and evolution of the marginal ice zone is determined by the mutual interaction of ocean waves and floes, as waves propagate into the ice, bend it, and fracture it. In previous work, we developed a one-dimensional “superparameterized” scheme to simulate the interaction between the stochastic ocean surface wave field and se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sea ice and wave models are on a displaced-pole nominal 1 grid (gx1v7), and the size of model grid cells near observations in the Beaufort Sea is approximately 50 km×50 km. This model is the same as FSD-WAVEv2 in [3], except that (i) we use a higher wave-ice coupling frequency, exchanging the wave spectrum and SIC, thickness, and mean floe size every hour to better resolve short-time-scale wave-ice interactions; (ii) we modify the numerical approach such that the source term for wave-ice interactions in WW3, Sice, is applied alongside the other source terms without time-splitting (which appears to be impactful for the nominal 1 resolution); and (iii) we use WIFF1.0 [34] for floe fracture, which is a computationally efficient version of the parametrization in [33] developed using machine learning. In WW3, the global timestep is set to 1800 s, the spatial propagation is set to 600 s, the intra-spectral propagation is set to 1800 s, and the minimum source-term step is set to 20 s. The model spin-up period covers 2000–2018, and sensitivity experiments with varied attenuation schemes are run for one year each, branched from the spin-up at 1 January 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sea ice and wave models are on a displaced-pole nominal 1 grid (gx1v7), and the size of model grid cells near observations in the Beaufort Sea is approximately 50 km×50 km. This model is the same as FSD-WAVEv2 in [3], except that (i) we use a higher wave-ice coupling frequency, exchanging the wave spectrum and SIC, thickness, and mean floe size every hour to better resolve short-time-scale wave-ice interactions; (ii) we modify the numerical approach such that the source term for wave-ice interactions in WW3, Sice, is applied alongside the other source terms without time-splitting (which appears to be impactful for the nominal 1 resolution); and (iii) we use WIFF1.0 [34] for floe fracture, which is a computationally efficient version of the parametrization in [33] developed using machine learning. In WW3, the global timestep is set to 1800 s, the spatial propagation is set to 600 s, the intra-spectral propagation is set to 1800 s, and the minimum source-term step is set to 20 s. The model spin-up period covers 2000–2018, and sensitivity experiments with varied attenuation schemes are run for one year each, branched from the spin-up at 1 January 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W. Bateson et al: Impacts of floe size on sea ice mass elling techniques could significantly mitigate the computational cost (e.g. Horvat and Roach, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that future advancements in modelling techniques may reduce or mitigate the computational expense or complexity of either model; e.g. Horvat and Roach (2022) presented a machine-learning-based parameterisation to simulate wave break-up of sea ice floes that can replace the existing treatment of wave break-up in the prognostic model. The study found that CICE simulations including the prognostic model with this new parameterisation have an approximately 40 % longer run time than CICE simulations without the prognostic model, i.e.…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Fsd Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a 2019 storm in the Barents Sea was observed to generate waves in sea ice with heights above 2 m, which decayed over distances of several hundred kilometres into the sea ice near Svalbard (Horvat et al, 2020). With IS-2 operational since October 2018 and orbiting the Earth 15 times per day, the IS-2 dataset provides global coverage and combined with information about along-track floe sizes, concentrations and thicknesses can provide unique information about wave attenuation for climate models (Tilling et al, 2018;Horvat et al, 2019;Roach et al, 2019;Horvat and Roach, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%