2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3323634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WiFi 5GHz CSI-Based Single-AP Localization With Centimeter-Level Median Error

Shamman Noor Shoudha,
Sherief Helwa,
Jayson P. Van Marter
et al.

Abstract: Localization schemes based on one-way Channel Frequency Response (CFR) are limited in terms of the available coherent bandwidth due to random timing and phase offsets. Two-way CFR-based localization schemes utilize higher coherent bandwidth but suffer from Angle-of-Arrival (AoA) estimation ambiguity. In this paper, we investigate efficient localization schemes for ubiquitous WiFi networks in the 5GHz unlicensed frequency band by utilizing both the one-way and two-way WiFi Channel State Information (CSI) to ove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different ways to perform localization in the absence of GPS signals [7][8][9] Although RF-based ranging approaches such as Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi)-based localization [39], cellular positioning using signals from technologies such as 4G Long-Term Evolution (LTE) or 5G New Radio (NR) [40], and Bluetooth-based geolocation [41] are prevalent in commercial systems due to their longer range compared to acoustic signals, there are significant drawbacks that make these approaches less suitable for applications where accuracy is paramount over range. In the literature, researchers have often preferred acoustic methods over RF (including Wi-Fi, cellular, RFID tags, and others) due to concerns regarding accuracy [12,14].…”
Section: Localization In the Absence Of Gps 41 Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different ways to perform localization in the absence of GPS signals [7][8][9] Although RF-based ranging approaches such as Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi)-based localization [39], cellular positioning using signals from technologies such as 4G Long-Term Evolution (LTE) or 5G New Radio (NR) [40], and Bluetooth-based geolocation [41] are prevalent in commercial systems due to their longer range compared to acoustic signals, there are significant drawbacks that make these approaches less suitable for applications where accuracy is paramount over range. In the literature, researchers have often preferred acoustic methods over RF (including Wi-Fi, cellular, RFID tags, and others) due to concerns regarding accuracy [12,14].…”
Section: Localization In the Absence Of Gps 41 Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%