2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.16.300731
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wild flies hedge their thermal preference bets in response to seasonal fluctuations

Abstract: Fluctuating environmental pressures can challenge organisms by repeatedly shifting the optimum phenotype. Two contrasting evolutionary strategies to cope with these fluctuations are 1) evolution of the mean phenotype to follow the optimum (adaptive tracking) or 2) diversifying phenotypes so that at least some individuals have high fitness in the current fluctuation (bet-hedging). Bet-hedging could underlie stable differences in the behavior of individuals that are present even when genotype and environment are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree to which individuals within an isogenic population show divergent preferences is strongly influenced by genetics, as shown by studies showing differing amounts of individuality between isogenic populations with different genetic backgrounds ( Ayroles et al, 2015 ; Bruijning et al, 2020 ), demonstrating that intra-genotypic variability is under evolutionary control. This is supported by observed differences in population variability that match theoretical predictions of environments where variability provides a fitness advantage ( Akhund-Zade et al, 2020 ; Krams et al, 2021 ). One key proposed mechanism for the regulation of individuality is neuromodulation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The degree to which individuals within an isogenic population show divergent preferences is strongly influenced by genetics, as shown by studies showing differing amounts of individuality between isogenic populations with different genetic backgrounds ( Ayroles et al, 2015 ; Bruijning et al, 2020 ), demonstrating that intra-genotypic variability is under evolutionary control. This is supported by observed differences in population variability that match theoretical predictions of environments where variability provides a fitness advantage ( Akhund-Zade et al, 2020 ; Krams et al, 2021 ). One key proposed mechanism for the regulation of individuality is neuromodulation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Fly strains from these sites exhibit lab-stable differences in variability, consistent with a genotypic basis to bet-hedging (Category 3). We speculate that individual phototactic preferences may have fitness consequences (Category 4) through temperaturedependent effects on life history (Kain et al, 2015;Akhund-Zade et al, 2020) or differential access to environmental resources. However, establishing this link empirically and acquiring evidence for bet-hedging in Categories 5 and 6 will require additional studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing nervous systems employ various compensation mechanisms to dampen out the effects of these fluctuations 9,20 . But behavioral variation may be beneficial, supporting a bet-hedging strategy 50 to counter environmental fluctuations 4,[51][52][53] . Empirically, the net effect of dampening and accreted ontological 54 fluctuations is individuals with diverse behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%