1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wild-type egr1/Krox24 promotes and dominant-negative mutants inhibit, pluripotent differentiation of p19 embryonal carcinoma cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of Egr1 has effects in both hematopoietic and neural lineages and appears to be a potent inducer of differentiation in several multipotent cell types. In P19 cells, tight control of Egr1 is essential for maintaining the pluripotent state (22,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The loss of Egr1 has effects in both hematopoietic and neural lineages and appears to be a potent inducer of differentiation in several multipotent cell types. In P19 cells, tight control of Egr1 is essential for maintaining the pluripotent state (22,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In P19 EC cells, increased Egr1 levels cause spontaneous differentiation, whereas dominant-negative Egr1 strongly blocks differentiation (24). This suggests a conserved role for Egr1 in differentiation.…”
Section: And Mescmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Egr proteins can repress transcription by displacement of Sp1, a well characterized, ubiquitous zinc fingercontaining, DNA-binding protein (47). Importantly, this repression-by-displacement mechanism appears to require more than just the DNA-binding domain of the Egr protein, because it can be blocked by overexpression of an Egr1 construct lacking the Nterminal regulatory domain (48). Genes whose expression is downregulated in this manner are distinguished by the absence of a proximal TATA or CAAT box and the presence of overlapping Sp1/Egr1 binding sites (18,47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructs, Transfections, and Reporter Assays-The PGK-puro vector, WT Egr-1/Krox-24, and dominant-negative mutants (WT minus the zinc finger region and the zinc finger region only) were a kind gift from Dr. D. Skup, and the construction of the plasmids has been described previously (28). Briefly, human egr-1/krox-24 cDNA was removed from the pMexNeoKrox-24 vector and inserted into the EcoRI site of the PGK-puro vector (puromycin for selection), which utilizes the PGK promoter to drive transcription, and thus generated the pPGK-Egr-1/ Krox-24 expression plasmid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oligonucleotides were used to amplify the zinc finger region from pMexNeoKrox-24, and the resulting fragment was then cloned into BamHI/ XbaI-digested PGK vector. Sequencing confirmed that the insert was correct and in-frame (28). Promoter constructs containing 1395 bp of the egr-1/krox-24 promoter region along with Ϫ925, Ϫ636, Ϫ459, Ϫ252, and Ϫ77 deletion mutants were kindly provided by Dr. D. Skup, whereas the pTNFϪ615CAT construct was a gift from Dr.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%