2022
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences12010020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wildfires and Monsoons: Cryptic Drivers for Highly Variable Provenance Signals within a Carboniferous Fluvial System

Abstract: Sediment delivery and supply are explicitly controlled by variations in broad-scale processes such as climate, tectonics and eustasy. These in turn influence fluvial processes and hinterland evolution. A bespoke multi-proxy approach (integrating apatite and zircon U-Pb geochronology, trace elements in apatite, and Pb-in-K-feldspar provenance tools) coupled with outcrop investigation is used to constrain the temporal trends in sediment delivery to channel sandstones of the fluvio-estuarine mid-Viséan Mullaghmor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively higher contribution of the adjacent Permian covers indicated the enhanced erosion of the downstream sector of the onshore catchment (Figure 16b). The increased sediment supply could be linked with high precipitation and seasonal floods due to the spatial climate variability of the entire drainage system, while fluvial rejuvenation could also intensify the denudation of the downstream sector during the lowstand period (Anders, Tyrrell, Chew, Mark, et al., 2022; Anders, Tyrrell, Chew, O'Sullivan, et al., 2022). In addition, it could be alternatively attributed to partial sediment buffering in the downstream sector of the onshore catchment, which may have strongly shredded the upstream provenance signals (Figure 16b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relatively higher contribution of the adjacent Permian covers indicated the enhanced erosion of the downstream sector of the onshore catchment (Figure 16b). The increased sediment supply could be linked with high precipitation and seasonal floods due to the spatial climate variability of the entire drainage system, while fluvial rejuvenation could also intensify the denudation of the downstream sector during the lowstand period (Anders, Tyrrell, Chew, Mark, et al., 2022; Anders, Tyrrell, Chew, O'Sullivan, et al., 2022). In addition, it could be alternatively attributed to partial sediment buffering in the downstream sector of the onshore catchment, which may have strongly shredded the upstream provenance signals (Figure 16b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the provenance signal could be significantly perturbated by high‐frequency climate change (Caracciolo, 2020, 2021; Clift & Jonell, 2021). High‐frequency provenance changes could be directly related to discharge, currents, waves and differential settling at a more local scale, contributing to different magnitudes of sediment mixing (Anders, Tyrrell, Chew, Mark, et al., 2022; Anders, Tyrrell, Chew, O'Sullivan, et al., 2022). Previous source‐to‐sink studies have recently concentrated on relatively shorter timescale temporal variations mostly late Cenozoic to Quaternary loess (Pullen et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022), fluvial deposits (Clift & Giosan, 2014; Clift & Jonell, 2021; Gutiérrez & Stockli, 2023; Neubeck et al., 2023) and river mouth to deep‐water deposits (Blum et al., 2018; Fildani et al., 2018; Mason et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2022), but further understanding of high‐frequency provenance variations in deep‐time depositional records remains relatively poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%