2009
DOI: 10.1038/nrc2665
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wildlife cancer: a conservation perspective

Abstract: Until recently, cancer in wildlife was not considered to be a conservation concern. However, with the identification of Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease, sea turtle fibropapillomatosis and sea lion genital carcinoma, it has become apparent that neoplasia can be highly prevalent and have considerable effects on some species. It is also clear that anthropogenic activities contribute to the development of neoplasia in wildlife species, such as beluga whales and bottom-dwelling fish, making them sensitive sen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
146
2
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
1
146
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research should include tumour lineage dynamics within an evolutionary epidemiological analytical framework, as well as assessing variation in host tolerance to different DFTD genetic variants under different ecological or immunological conditions. Transmissible clonal cancers in wildlife have only recently been recognized as a threat to biodiversity conservation [12,43], including both direct effects on species decline and the trophic cascades that result from the loss of keystone species and ecological functions, such as is occurring in Tasmania with the severe decline of its top mammalian predator [44]. The Tasmanian devil's facial tumour disease is a new transmissible cancer that we have studied in the wild almost since its emergence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should include tumour lineage dynamics within an evolutionary epidemiological analytical framework, as well as assessing variation in host tolerance to different DFTD genetic variants under different ecological or immunological conditions. Transmissible clonal cancers in wildlife have only recently been recognized as a threat to biodiversity conservation [12,43], including both direct effects on species decline and the trophic cascades that result from the loss of keystone species and ecological functions, such as is occurring in Tasmania with the severe decline of its top mammalian predator [44]. The Tasmanian devil's facial tumour disease is a new transmissible cancer that we have studied in the wild almost since its emergence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This knowledge is best developed in the veterinary literature on domestic animals, for which virtually all examples of infectious causes of cancer involve viral aetiologies [2]. Although the literature on cancer in wild vertebrates is much less complete, the current state of knowledge implicates a disproportionate involvement of viruses relative to other pathogens ( [53,54]; table 2).…”
Section: Infectious Cancers In Vertebrates (A) Historical Trendmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sea turtle fibropapillomatosis, which is caused by an alpha herpesvirus, for example, is more prevalent in areas subject to pollution from human activities [135,136], although a variety of correlates of human activity could be causally involved [135]. Levels of polychlorinated biphenyls are elevated in the blubber of genital carcinomas of sea lions induced by a gammaherpesvirus [53,137]. Polychlorinated biphenyls have been classified as carcinogens but also have immunosuppressive effects [138].…”
Section: Environmental Pollutants Infection and Control Of Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of contagious cancer is well known among dogs and other canines, [8] Tasmanian devils, [9] Syrian hamster, [10,11] sea lions (genital carcinoma), sea turtles (fibropapillomatosis), beluga whales, bottom-dwelling fish [12,13] and so on. Venereal cancer of dogs is usually transmitted when dogs mate, resulting in the direct physical intrusion of viable cancerous matter from an afflicted dog to a healthy one.…”
Section: Origin and Transmissibility Of Animal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%