2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wildlife responses to thinning and burning treatments in southwestern conifer forests: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
88
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, more emphasis has been placed on not only reducing fire hazard through forest thinning, but designing treatments to simulate a heterogeneous stand structure more characteristic of the past (Carey, 2003;North et al, 2009;Verschuyl et al, 2011). Our results on the impact of treatments on individual species support recent syntheses that suggest that forest thinning through the removal of small diameter trees typical of a fuel reduction prescription has a neutral to positive effect on many avian species (Hurteau et al, 2008;Gaines et al, 2010;Kalies et al, 2010;Verschuyl et al, 2011). Our results are therefore consistent with previous studies that suggest modest responses by avifauna to removal of small diameter trees, but our Bayesian hierarchical model provides further insight into how different treatments may affect the less commonly occurring species, species for which inferences are usually not possible under different statistical approaches due to small sample sizes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Recently, more emphasis has been placed on not only reducing fire hazard through forest thinning, but designing treatments to simulate a heterogeneous stand structure more characteristic of the past (Carey, 2003;North et al, 2009;Verschuyl et al, 2011). Our results on the impact of treatments on individual species support recent syntheses that suggest that forest thinning through the removal of small diameter trees typical of a fuel reduction prescription has a neutral to positive effect on many avian species (Hurteau et al, 2008;Gaines et al, 2010;Kalies et al, 2010;Verschuyl et al, 2011). Our results are therefore consistent with previous studies that suggest modest responses by avifauna to removal of small diameter trees, but our Bayesian hierarchical model provides further insight into how different treatments may affect the less commonly occurring species, species for which inferences are usually not possible under different statistical approaches due to small sample sizes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In virtually all cases, we took the mean of species abundances across years to avoid pseudoreplication and lack of independence in observations. Where studies had just one replicate measured over time, taking the mean abundance across years also permitted us to estimate variance to properly weight studies and avoid use of proxy weighting schemes (e.g., weighting by plot size; Kalies et al 2010). Two exceptions (Allen et al 2006, Kotliar et al 2007) occurred where authors analyzed two independently collected and spatially discrete data sets and provided separate results.…”
Section: Study Selection and Data Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there is a negative response to intensive logging, but a neutral to positive response to thinning (see meta-analyses by Kalies et al, 2010;Verschuyl et al, 2011). The uniformity of thinning through space and thinning intensity can drive the magnitude and direction of responses , particularly for bird species (Hayes et al, 2003;Hagar et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%