2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-629x.2006.00203.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Will investors change their superannuation fund given the choice?

Abstract: A large number of Australian investors have been granted the right to choose where their superannuation fund contributions will be invested, but it is difficult to ascertain whether investors will exercise this choice. Although expected-utility-maximizing investors might tend to change their fund once given the choice, loss averse investors would favour the status quo. Using a survey of over 1600 Australian investors, conducted by FinaMetrica in early 2005, we find support for inertia (status quo) in our sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average number of transactions was 0.26 and there was one trade every 3.85 years. However, once a worker participates in a 401 (k) plan he is unlikely to withdraw (Kusko et al 1994) and very few individuals who were enrolled with a default plan would change if they were given the choice (Fry et al 2007). …”
Section: Active Management (10 Papers)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The average number of transactions was 0.26 and there was one trade every 3.85 years. However, once a worker participates in a 401 (k) plan he is unlikely to withdraw (Kusko et al 1994) and very few individuals who were enrolled with a default plan would change if they were given the choice (Fry et al 2007). …”
Section: Active Management (10 Papers)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this approach the factors precipitating a choice are separate, or overlap, with the factors that explain the allocation. Although discussing the broader decision to switch between superannuation funds, Fry et al (2007) use Prospect theory to articulate a persuasive case that given loss aversion the expected benefit/cost ratio needed to be substantial to encourage a switch. This explanation fits the low level of choice observed for Australian superannuation fund members overall, coupled with increase in activity in periods of extreme market movements, for example in October 2008 during global financial crisis (Gerrans, 2012).…”
Section: Available Member Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the investors age, there is an indication they tend to become return-chasers. A survey of Australian investors by Fry et al (2007) find support to the behavioral theory of investor inertia, with few surveyed participants showing an interest in changing their superannuation fund. Phillips (2011) recently examines the relative risk aversion coefficient that characterizes the representative self-managed superannuation fund investor.…”
Section: Significance and Scope Of The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%