2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10739-019-09568-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

William Benjamin Carpenter and the Emerging Science of Heredity

Abstract: In the nineteenth century, farmers, doctors, and the wider public shared a family of questions and anxieties concerning heredity. Questions over whether injuries, mutilations, and bad habits could be transmitted to offspring had existed for centuries, but found renewed urgency in the popular and practical scientific press from the 1820s onwards. Sometimes referred to as "Lamarckism" or "the inheritance of acquired characteristics," the potential for transmitting both desirable and disastrous traits to offsprin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes this produces sensations-mental phenomena of which we are conscious. Sometimes, however, ¹⁴ On Carpenter's huge influence on nineteenth-century British medicine, see Lidwell-Durnin (2020).…”
Section: Lovelace and The Thinking Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes this produces sensations-mental phenomena of which we are conscious. Sometimes, however, ¹⁴ On Carpenter's huge influence on nineteenth-century British medicine, see Lidwell-Durnin (2020).…”
Section: Lovelace and The Thinking Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to what is generally assumed of the origin of the laws of heredity—often coupled with the experiments of Gregor Johann Mendel (1822–1884)—interest in studying the transmission of traits and their theoretical conceptualization began to emerge in the eighteenth century. There is a growing consensus that the concepts of biological heredity were gradually constructed from the knowledge scattered in different domains, such as philosophy, jurisprudence, medicine, horticulture, and animal breeding (López-Beltrán 2006 ; Lidwell-Durnin 2020 ; McLaughlin 2007 , p. 281; Poczai and Santiago-Blay 2022 ). Thus, the formation of the epistemic space of heredity as a scientific discipline required assimilating ideas from several other disciplines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing scientific consensus that the concepts of biological heredity were gradually constructed from the knowledge scattered in different scientific domains such as embryology, philosophy, jurisprudence, medicine, horticulture, and animal breeding [ 2 – 12 ]. Thus, the formation of the epistemic space of heredity as a scientific discipline required cross-cutting through several marginalized disciplines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%