1973
DOI: 10.1215/00182702-5-1-89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

William Graham Sumner's Social Darwinism: A Reconsideration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter gave a specific meaning to social Darwinism (Bannister, 1973), in particular emphasizing a strong connection Accordingly, Hofstadter The distance with Spencer and social Darwinism that Darwin seems cautious to put forward illustrates the difference that exists between his theory of biological evolution and his theory of social evolution, which we found in particular exposed in the Descent of Man. In effect, although he was convinced that "man was part of the #0521 evolutionary process" and therefore that his theory was likely to apply to animals and to man also 4 That the group is the target of social evolution does not mean that social evolution does not rest on "natural selection"; however, the role of this principle is complemented by other factors such as moral sentiments and, more precisely, on sympathy:…”
Section: Richard Hofstadter's Influential and Much Read Social Darwinmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The latter gave a specific meaning to social Darwinism (Bannister, 1973), in particular emphasizing a strong connection Accordingly, Hofstadter The distance with Spencer and social Darwinism that Darwin seems cautious to put forward illustrates the difference that exists between his theory of biological evolution and his theory of social evolution, which we found in particular exposed in the Descent of Man. In effect, although he was convinced that "man was part of the #0521 evolutionary process" and therefore that his theory was likely to apply to animals and to man also 4 That the group is the target of social evolution does not mean that social evolution does not rest on "natural selection"; however, the role of this principle is complemented by other factors such as moral sentiments and, more precisely, on sympathy:…”
Section: Richard Hofstadter's Influential and Much Read Social Darwinmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The reasons are understandable. Some early sociologists supported social Darwinism (Bannister 1973), which was in turn used to justify the racist policies of the German Third Reich. Postwar sociology, hence, attempted to steer clear of any discussion of biological foundations, a tendency only reinforced by the continued attempts to give pseudoscientific foundations to antisemitism in Europe and discrimination against blacks in the United States (Degler 1991).…”
Section: A Brief Historical Perspective Of the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sumner objected to government intervention because the result was the worst of all monopolies, the purpose of which was the exploitation of others (Sumner 1924, p. 227). He believed that the German historical school was attracting a generation of American economists away from the truth (Bannister 1973). 5 The German historical school favored an extensive welfare state that required a sacrifice of personal liberty (Sumner 1924, p. 268).…”
Section: William Graham Sumner and Yalementioning
confidence: 99%