1957
DOI: 10.5195/reviberoamer.1957.1801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

William Shand y Alberto Girri, Poesía norteamericana contemporánea y T. S. Eliot, Cuatro cuartetos

Abstract: EDUARDO BLANCO AMOR, La catedral y el ni/jo, nueva edici6n de Losada de Buenos Aires, del 4 de octubre de 1956. 405 pp. Vifieta en la cubierta por Silvio Baldessari. El autor, Eduardo Blanco-Amor, naci6 en Orense (Galicia) a principios del siglo, y desde 1918 ha vivido casi todo el tiempo en Buenos Aires, dedicado con gran 6xito a la poesia, el teatro, la novela, el ensayo, la critica, el periodismo y la citedra. La catedral y el nino es una novela descriptiva, especialmente de la vida y costumbres de Orense, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the MEK remains a fundamentally Neoclassical concept whereby it declines with capital-deepening' (TP, 30). This statement is disturbing because it confuses the neoclassical concept of marginal productivity based on capital deepening with the Keynesian concept of marginal efficiency based on capital widening (seeHeise 1990).4 Engaging in a discussion about Palley's contribution is not solely an academic exercise, but it also recognizes the fact that Palley, given his extensive publications on related topics (see e.g.,Palley 1996, Palley 1997, Palley 1998a, Palley 1998b, Palley 2002, is widely regarded as an esteemed advocate and expert on Keynes' economics. As a result, his arguments and perspectives hold significant weight and should be treated with seriousness and consideration.5 Withdrawing from commenting on these views does not imply that I share them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the MEK remains a fundamentally Neoclassical concept whereby it declines with capital-deepening' (TP, 30). This statement is disturbing because it confuses the neoclassical concept of marginal productivity based on capital deepening with the Keynesian concept of marginal efficiency based on capital widening (seeHeise 1990).4 Engaging in a discussion about Palley's contribution is not solely an academic exercise, but it also recognizes the fact that Palley, given his extensive publications on related topics (see e.g.,Palley 1996, Palley 1997, Palley 1998a, Palley 1998b, Palley 2002, is widely regarded as an esteemed advocate and expert on Keynes' economics. As a result, his arguments and perspectives hold significant weight and should be treated with seriousness and consideration.5 Withdrawing from commenting on these views does not imply that I share them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%