2016
DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Williams–Beuren syndrome: pitfalls for diagnosis in limited resources setting

Abstract: Key Clinical MessagePatients with Williams–Beuren Syndrome can be recognized clinically, given the characteristic dysmorphism, intellectual disability, and behavior. We report on a Congolese boy with typical WBS facial characteristics. He suffered meningitis and coma at the age of 2 years then subsequently presented with profound intellectual disability and atypical behavior. The WBS was only made at age 8.2 years and confirmed with FISH testing and microarray‐CGH. The present report aims to warn clinicians th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we sought to use the FDNA technology to automatically identify facial phenotypes associated with 2 of the yet 6 known sSMC syndromes, that is, ES and PKS. The here presented results support the evidence, that computer aided facial recognition can help in the clinic and could possibly reduce the time patients spend in the diagnostic odyssey in general . Specifically, the FDNA technology may now also help to differentiate ES or PKS from each other and from other patients with sSMCs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we sought to use the FDNA technology to automatically identify facial phenotypes associated with 2 of the yet 6 known sSMC syndromes, that is, ES and PKS. The here presented results support the evidence, that computer aided facial recognition can help in the clinic and could possibly reduce the time patients spend in the diagnostic odyssey in general . Specifically, the FDNA technology may now also help to differentiate ES or PKS from each other and from other patients with sSMCs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As a form of NGP, we used in this study the facial dysmorphology novel analysis (Face2Gene; FDNA inc., Boston, MA, USA) technology to automatically identify facial phenotypes associated with ES and PKS from 2D facial photos. The discriminatory power of such technology to recognize the phenotype of patients was recently and repeatedly described …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could prove to be particularly important in developing nations where access to molecular testing is limited. 22 Although promising as a detection system, clinical assessment must be used adjunctively with FDNA when characterizing other domains within FASD diagnostic criteria. For example, clinical judgment is needed when assessing the significance of neurodevelopmental delays, the veracity of alcohol exposure reports, and in ruling out other possible genetic or teratogenic causes of the phenotypes identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This deep phenotyping technology is trained to identify specific syndromes from a patient's facial photo and may be helpful for medical professionals who work in clinical genetics (Basel‐Vanagaite et al, ; Lumaka et al, ) as well as in complementing exome analysis by inferring causative genetic variants from sequencing data (Gripp, Baker, Telegrafi, & Monaghan, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%